 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsBoatsPaddle BoatsSailingCruisingBuildingElectronics Related Topics CarsMotorcyclesMore Topics ... |
Boat Forum / Boats / July 2006Boycott Gettysburg
Link to photos showing how the battlefield looked before superintendent John Latschar raped it. http://users.snip.net/~hart/ We loved Gettysburg: took dozens of week-long trips, spent many thousands of dollars there, but those days are over thanks to park superintendent John Latschar. He's ruining the battlefield. He calls it restoration. Desecration is more descriptive. If we spent another dime we'd be supporting the destruction. Trees are being ripped out wholesale. The deer have been slaughtered. Visiting on a Nov. evening is an experience everyone should be able to enjoy, but he shortened the hours so you'll be ticketed and labeled criminals. He threw up so many one-way signs that traffic has become a tourist's nightmare. He likes saying, "The time for comment was during the planning, not now." Well, Bozo, the public DID and continues to comment, but you ignore them. Tens of 1000s have voiced their concern, but you act as though the battlefield is your own private domain. It belongs to the taxpayers, not an arrogant, government-appointed bureaucrat. Ghost hunters have been turned away in droves. He said they're in the same category as drug users. (look it up) What a moron. Not only is the town losing a fortune toward the local economy, the park is losing thousands of watchful eyes. Those with evil intent will always gain access at night, as was proven by the recent vandalism. Closing the park merely keeps honest folks out. John Latschar has, in affect, given vandals free rein. Attendance is lagging. He blames everything except his own bumbling. He moans about never having enough money, yet continues wasting funds on senseless projects that divide the townspeople and drives others away. It's typical government ineptness. Looks like John Latschar sits around dreaming up new ways to piss people off. If he's not shooting the wildlife, cutting down 100s of acres of trees, or screwing up traffic flow, he'll devise some other dumbass plan. Chances are he'll eventually move on to another location leaving his mess and debts behind for someone else. (He's done it before) What's worse than allowing John Latschar to inflict so much damage to such hallowed ground? Most of you sit idly by and let it happen without so much as a whimper. Talk is cheap, holding back spending speaks volumes. We're doing our part. Good bye Gettysburg. You were our favorite place on Earth until John Latschar raped you. Now you're just a memory. What a pity and disgrace. > Link to photos showing how the battlefield looked before superintendent > John [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > Gettysburg. You were our favorite place on Earth until John Latschar raped > you. Now you're just a memory. What a pity and disgrace. Find out if he uses outside contractors for some of the work, especially the ongoing tree work. Then, write a letter to the local paper. Using the most innocent wording you can muster, question whether Latschar might be just a little bit too cozy with some of these contractors. Bribed, in other words. He's probably not, but it's always fun to drag a local whore out from under his rock and into the spotlight. >> Link to photos showing how the battlefield looked before superintendent >> John [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > He's probably not, but it's always fun to drag a local whore out from under > his rock and into the spotlight. Halliburton syndrome? >>> Link to photos showing how the battlefield looked before superintendent >>> John [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > > Halliburton syndrome? It begins locally. I'm about to write a letter to our local paper about yet another major project that'll eat up taxpayer money, cause traffic problems, and in the end, fail and/or be hated by everyone who views it. It's an awful idea, and yet, a number of politicians are pushing relentlessly to go ahead with it. Public comment meetings have almost turned violent because it's clear that the fix is in, the meetings are pointless. The letter will probaby result in my being sued for slander, or my home being blown up. I'll be suggesting that the politicians who favor the project should explain their relationships with certain construction companies, or be looked at by the FBI. > The letter will probaby result in my being sued for slander, or my home > being blown up. I'll be suggesting that the politicians who favor the > project should explain their relationships with certain construction > companies, or be looked at by the FBI. If you care about the issue then act. Just whinging about it on a newsgroup, especially one entirely unrelated to the issue, is pointless. To then cop out whining that you're afraid you'll get bombed or claim conspiracy theories with the government just makes you look like a crackpot. >> The letter will probaby result in my being sued for slander, or my home >> being blown up. I'll be suggesting that the politicians who favor the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > conspiracy theories with the government just makes you look like a > crackpot. Oh, believe me, I'll be at the public meetings, even though they're pointless. Letters to the local papers are probably pointless, too, although it might be fun to see a few of the crooks work up a sweat in their responses. You wrote: > Find out if he uses outside contractors for some of the work, > especially the ongoing tree work. Then, write a letter to the local [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > fun to drag a local whore out from under his rock and into the > spotlight. Figures a sewer rat like you would try to twist an obvious government fuckup into an attack on honest private enterprise. Note that PRIVATE historic facilities such as Mount Vernon and Biltmore Estate preserve their integrity, and don't tolerate arrogant PC whackjobs like Latschar. The two ARE related. > You wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Figures a sewer rat like you would try to twist an obvious government > fuckup into an attack on honest private enterprise. Your childish and petty name calling and insults do nothing but harm your credibility. > Note that PRIVATE historic facilities such as Mount Vernon and Biltmore > Estate preserve their integrity, and don't tolerate arrogant PC whackjobs > like Latschar. The two ARE related. Private facilities are in it for the money, period. IF the public spends money on a place because of it's preserved integrity, so good. But, if the private entity sees a dollar more can be made by destroying said integrity, it will. Case in point is Stone Mountain Park here in Georgia. When the state had it, it was a great place, quiet when you wanted quiet, cool functions to go to every month or so. Then, the state sold it to a private entity, and it's turned into just another money grab. It's the same company that owns Dollywood. They've turned a historically significant place into an amusement park. You wrote: >> Note that PRIVATE historic facilities such as Mount Vernon and >> Biltmore Estate preserve their integrity, and don't tolerate arrogant >> PC whackjobs like Latschar. The two ARE related. > > Private facilities are in it for the money, period. Mount Vernon and Biltmore are NON-PROFIT. Why is every post of yours further proof of your abject stupidity? > You wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Figures a sewer rat like you would try to twist an obvious government > fuckup into an attack on honest private enterprise. Figures an immature little twat like you would pretend corruption is unlikely in these situations when, in fact, it happens all the time. You wrote: >> You wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Figures an immature little twat like you would pretend corruption is > unlikely in these situations when, in fact, it happens all the time. No, I'm the one who pointed out that GOVERNMENT operations are FAR MORE LIKELY to be corrupt. > You wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > No, I'm the one who pointed out that GOVERNMENT operations are FAR MORE > LIKELY to be corrupt. Perhaps if you'd use what little intellectual skill you have to write clearly, instead of beginning your participation by insulting people, you would have communicated the first time. More drivel from yet another "anonymous" rec.boats poster with no balls. > Link to photos showing how the battlefield looked before superintendent John > Latschar raped it. [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > Gettysburg. You were our favorite place on Earth until John Latschar raped > you. Now you're just a memory. What a pity and disgrace. Didn't know you could tour the battlefield by boat >> Link to photos showing how the battlefield looked before superintendent John >> Latschar raped it. [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > Didn't know you could tour the battlefield by boat Sure. Just sit in your bassboat while your sweetie drives the rig through the park. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.