Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsBoatsPaddle BoatsSailingCruisingBuildingElectronics
Related Topics
CarsMotorcyclesMore Topics ...

Boat Forum / Boats / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Top heavy?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David - 03 Jul 2008 16:34 GMT
I've got an old boat very much like this one:

http://www.warnersdock.com/images/Freebies/fores15yel.JPG

that I'm trying to make into a mini-houseboat,
sort of like a camper. I only expect to have
about 200-300 pounds in the roof and walls,
and the roof will only be about 48" above
the gunwale. The hull will weigh a *lot* more
than what is added, so shouldn't that alone
be enough to keep it from being top heavy
and flipping over? If I add weight, like a
couple hundred pound bags of sand down
in the hull to counterballance, shouldn't
that take care of it? If so, should they
be placed on the sides, or in the center?
justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com - 03 Jul 2008 19:57 GMT
> I've got an old boat very much like this one:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> that take care of it? If so, should they
> be placed on the sides, or in the center?

This is a bad idea on several levels. Even if you can make the math
seem to work, the hull is designed to sit at a certain level in the
water so as to be safe during all aspects of operation while cruising
or in emergency conditions. Pitch a tent up there, or get a different
boat. It's like pulling a trailer that is too heavy for the vehicle.
The vehicle might get it rolling, but in an emergency can't react the
way you want it to, or the way it was designed.. You might get away
with it for years, but it could also get you killed in seconds. In a
nutshell, you have the wrong tool for the job. Change your plan, or
get a different boat... Just my opinion, but I am always against
modifying a tried and tested design..

Scotty
SmallBoats.com
Gogarty - 03 Jul 2008 21:23 GMT
In article
<96276237-48b8-4724-93aa-b4e87b88fef2@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com says...

>> I've got an old boat very much like this one:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>Scotty
>SmallBoats.com

It's not the weight. It's the moment.
Eisboch - 03 Jul 2008 21:30 GMT
> In article
> <96276237-48b8-4724-93aa-b4e87b88fef2@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> It's not the weight. It's the moment.

I think it all depends on how the OP intends to use his "houseboat".
3-4 footers in the ocean?   No way.
A lazy, small lake somewhere?   Go for it.

Eisboch
David - 03 Jul 2008 21:51 GMT
>> In article
>> <96276237-48b8-4724-93aa-b4e87b88fef2@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
>Eisboch

   It is on a lake. I wouldn't try it in the ocean. It's not as wide as the
houseboats around here, but it's not as tall either so I'm hoping it
will sort of balance out and be about the same thing. And when I
think about the cruisers in the ocean, with a flybridge, and then
a flybridge on top of the flybridge, and sometimes a flybridge on
top of the flybridge on top of the flybridge...how does all that work?
justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com - 03 Jul 2008 21:50 GMT
> In article
> <96276237-48b8-4724-93aa-b4e87b88f...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

I have programs here that will calculate any of it, but I was trying
to keep it simple for a layman..  At the same time, a note to the
OP... I defer to Eisboch in this case. He has much more experience
than I in this area... I have booklearnin' he has boats;)
Eisboch - 03 Jul 2008 22:01 GMT
I have programs here that will calculate any of it, but I was trying
to keep it simple for a layman..  At the same time, a note to the
OP... I defer to Eisboch in this case. He has much more experience
than I in this area... I have booklearnin' he has boats;)

--------------------------------

I have absolutely *no* experience in converting a small lake boat into a
houseboat.

Eisboch
justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com - 03 Jul 2008 22:32 GMT
> <justwaitafrekinmin...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Eisboch

Yes, but you have probably been in boats that size, or similar
configuration.... I have not..
Short Wave Sportfishing - 03 Jul 2008 20:09 GMT
>I've got an old boat very much like this one:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>that take care of it? If so, should they
>be placed on the sides, or in the center?

That hull doesn't weigh as much as you think it does. Plus, it's
essentially flat which, while counter-intuitive, makes it less stable.

Alll boats and ships obey two laws of physics - center of buoyancy
(CB) which is the center of the underwater volume of the vessel and
center of gravity (CG) which is where all the mass would be
concentrated if it had to be compressed to a single point.  To float
properly on the design waterline, then the CG must be in line
vertically with the CB.

Once you start messing around with CG (which is essentially what you
are doing), it throws off the CB (because they are interrelated) and
you are constantly playing catch-up to keep it properly oriented (dry
side up and wet side down).  Even adding 300 pounds isn't going to
affect anything much because your CB, which is not a constant and can
change depending on any number of factors, is out of whack.

Additionally, you have to worry about beam - it ain't got none to
speak of.

You can figure it all out if you really want to.

http://www.johnsboatstuff.com/Articles/estimati.htm

Good luck.
Bullschitter@hotmail.com - 03 Jul 2008 22:12 GMT
Did I miss something here It's a POS  sink it.

> I've got an old boat very much like this one:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> that take care of it? If so, should they
> be placed on the sides, or in the center?
justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com - 03 Jul 2008 22:33 GMT
On Jul 3, 5:12 pm, "Bullschit...@hotmail.com"
<Bullschit...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Did I miss something here It's a POS  sink it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yes, you missed the first line which suggests that this is not his
boat, but one with a similar hull configuration..His boat could be
spotless for all we know...
Gregory Hall - 04 Jul 2008 00:17 GMT
> I've got an old boat very much like this one:
>
> http://www.warnersdock.com/images/Freebies/fores15yel.JPG

<snip>

THIS is top-heavy:
http://images.thebiggestbreasts.com/post/20070820/humongous_fake_boobs.jpg

Caution: nudity. Adults only please.

--
Gregory Hall
Mike - 04 Jul 2008 03:18 GMT
Holy shi** <g>

--Mike

>> I've got an old boat very much like this one:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> --
> Gregory Hall
sailirc - 04 Jul 2008 04:14 GMT
> Holy shi** <g>
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>> --
>> Gregory Hall

LOL, is that a look of pain on her face
Heikki - 04 Jul 2008 05:46 GMT
> Holy shi** <g>

Yes indeed! Amazing what they can with modern plastics ;-)

>> THIS is top-heavy:

http://images.thebiggestbreasts.com/post/20070820/humongous_fake_boobs.jpg

>> Caution: nudity. Adults only please.
DK - 12 Jul 2008 01:28 GMT
>> I've got an old boat very much like this one:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> --
> Gregory Hall

WAFA will spend all week on that one.
John H. - 04 Jul 2008 01:29 GMT
>I've got an old boat very much like this one:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>that take care of it? If so, should they
>be placed on the sides, or in the center?

Use a tent! The thing will add only 20lbs to the boat, is easy to remove,
and can be configured all kinds of ways. Check LLBean for a tent that will
fit. Put a couple thermarest mattresses on the deck and you're good to go.
Matt Colie - 04 Jul 2008 03:27 GMT
David,
Get a book on Naval Architecture and read about GM.
Every boat has the center of gravity above the center of buoyancy.
Weight added alone might not keep it upright.
Matt Colie

> I've got an old boat very much like this one:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> that take care of it? If so, should they
> be placed on the sides, or in the center?
Roger Long - 04 Jul 2008 11:57 GMT
Matt,

Haven't heard from you in a while.  Nice to have you back.

I remember that you knew my boat in her previous life.  Take a look at her
now

http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Boat.htm

Have you heard anything about the previous owners?  Last I talked to them,
one was having some medical issues and they weren't sure if they were going
to be able to go cruising.  I've now lost contact.

Container ships sometimes have a slight negative GM, or used to 30 years ago
when we would watch them come down the harbor with a slight list, make the
turn, flop over, and continue on to sea with a slight list the other way.
They have enough freeboard and flare in the ends that the righting arms
would go positive after a couple degrees of heel.  This loading made for
minimal rolling and least strain on the upper layers of boxes.  You can only
get away with this in a very large ship though.

The mini houseboat fellow won't get very far trying to apply what he reads
about GM in a standard textbook to his problem.  He should weight a sheet of
plywood or get it's weight, calculate how much he needs to make the cabin,
add about 50% for framing and other stuff, and then add the estimated weight
of anything else he plans to put on board.  Next put a table on board with
the legs propped up a bit to get the top to about 75% of the cabin height.
Pile the table with the estimated weight and go aboard.  If the motion feels
drunken and sluggish with very slow rools, the boat will probably be
uncomfortable as well as dangerous.  Keep removing weight from the table
until a couple of people can walk around with the boat feeling solid and the
rail getting close to the water.   Then figure if he can build a cabin
within that weight allowance.

Strong winds are another issue but it sounds like this is a lake boat to
spend most of its time on a mooring.

--
Roger Long
Matt Colie - 04 Jul 2008 15:46 GMT
Roger,

I like both your practical answer and your pictures.

You're cruising my old stomping (sailing) ground.  I do miss the coast.

Tom had recovered well and was looking good last time I spoke to him.
I'll send him the URL to your pictures.

I was kind of hoping that this guy would get the plan that there is a
whole lot to know before his question could be answered effectively.

A tanker I was 2AE on had a negative GM and a slight port on the way
out.  Every wave made it snap to Stbd, stall a couple of seconds and
snap back.  It was all a guy could do to stay on his feet.  We did lose
the fire in one boiler, but the FM lit it off the bricks.  My chief
called the bridge and told them if they tried to make for sea this way,
he would shut them down.  - They believed him, but he still had to
listen to a bunch of griping because we lost two hours while they
finished correcting the ballast.

Matt
justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com - 04 Jul 2008 15:52 GMT
> Roger,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Matt

Well, at the risk of being simple. I still suggest it's the wrong boat
for the job. He just needs to start with the right boat. He can
justify, defend, and make any excuses he wants.. Still water,
whatever.. But once you leave the dock, things can change quickly to
something you have never seen before.
Anyway. Have a great fourth, go out in your boats for me;) Scotty
tsmwebb@gmail.com - 04 Jul 2008 17:52 GMT
On Jul 4, 7:52 am, justwaitafrekinmin...@gmail.com wrote:
...
> Well, at the risk of being simple. I still suggest it's the wrong boat
> for the job. He just needs to start with the right boat. He can
> justify, defend, and make any excuses he wants.. Still water,
> whatever.. But once you leave the dock, things can change quickly to
> something you have never seen before.
> Anyway. Have a great fourth, go out in your boats for me;) Scotty

It wouldn't surprise me in the least to find that the boat was
originally sold in several configurations (eg. bow rider, 1/3 decked,
cuddy cruiser, etc.).  So, if the guy wants to convert from one to the
other and enjoys doing the work the hull might well be adequate.
Since we've only got a pic of the deck it is a little hard to tell
what the hull form is, but given the bluff bow I'm guessing it's a
Whaler style.  If so, he's got oodles of stability.  In Hawaii many
small fishing boats have home built hard dodgers very like lobster
boat style cabins. They put them on to get some cover when operating
at sea and stability isn't typically an issue at all.  If I were
making this kind of conversion I'd put a little cuddy over the
foredeck, build a hard dodger and run some rails off of that aft to
use as supports for a Bimini, surfboard racks and tent.  I'd probably
also put a proper transom on the boat and build an external rack for
the outboard.  The cuddy and the transom will make the boat much less
susceptible to swamping the result may be more seaworthy than the
original.  Sure he can do some testing to see if stability is going to
be an issue.  I like Roger's method and if he can secure the table and
weights he can even go out and do some dynamic testing.  But, in the
end, I'd be amazed if a well constructed cuddy cabin would make the
boat dangerously unstable.

Happy 4th!

-- Tom.
Ernest Scribbler - 04 Jul 2008 17:22 GMT
> The mini houseboat fellow won't get very far trying to apply what he reads
> about GM in a standard textbook to his problem.

My guess from the OP's photo is that he has a tri-hull, of typical heavy
60s-style construction. If he goes through with his hard-top plan, I'm
thinking he'll end up with something akin to a pontoon boat.
justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com - 04 Jul 2008 17:29 GMT
On Jul 4, 12:22 pm, "Ernest Scribbler" <repl...@newsgroup.only.please>
wrote:

> > The mini houseboat fellow won't get very far trying to apply what he reads
> > about GM in a standard textbook to his problem.
>
> My guess from the OP's photo is that he has a tri-hull, of typical heavy
> 60s-style construction. If he goes through with his hard-top plan, I'm
> thinking he'll end up with something akin to a pontoon boat.

Here is a neat program that will give you some pretty basic ideas of
rightingmoments, bouyancy, trim, etc..

http://carlsondesign.com/#Fun_Shareware

It's shareware, but for a quick idea of a design and it's capability,
it is ok..
Richard Casady - 04 Jul 2008 15:58 GMT
>Every boat has the center of gravity above the center of buoyancy.

Why? Ever hear of heavy ballast keels? If the superstructure is heavy
that's one thing, but it doesn't have to be.

Casady
Heikki - 04 Jul 2008 06:16 GMT
> I've got an old boat very much like this one:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> that take care of it? If so, should they
> be placed on the sides, or in the center?

Well, boat stability is a complex subject. Here
some loose thoughts (before my first cup of coffee,
so no guarantees that I get all things right. I'm
sure others will jump on the chance to correct my
worst blunders - maybe I can learn something too!)

I would recommend you read a bit more about it. The
"Nature of Boats" by Dave Gerr is a good all-around
introduction, and doesn't get too technical. Many
other books work as well.

When you add weight and windage high up, you reduce
the stability. That increases the risk that your boat
will capsize in high seas (or even in flat water). It
also changes the way the boat rolls in seas, which may
make it more or less comfortable to be inside.

You are right, you can compensate by adding weight (as
low as possible!). This will make the boat sit deeper
in the water. Maybe too deep.

It all depends what you are going to use the boat for.
With a solid house on it, and enough ballast to keep her
upright, she will not want to plane. If you can live with
moving her at hull speed (a few knots), you can make do
with *much* smaller engine, and use the weight difference
as ballast. If you do not plan to move her around much at
all, then you can afford to load he a bit deeper, as the
sailing characteristics won't matter.

You can probably get an idea of the stability by doing a
simple roll period test. Rock the boat sideways, it will
settle on some speed of rolling from side to side. If
this roll time (in seconds) is the same as your overall
beam (in meters), (or 10% more), you have what Gerr
describes a good initial stability. If the boar rolls
much faster, you have more (initial) stability for
good comfort - that would be good news for you. If,
after all the construction, your boat rolls slower than
this, you may want to add some ballast.

In any case, keep the structure as low as you can manage,
and build it light! It looks like a small boat to begin
with, so don't even try to build a large house on her.
Keep it small and simple, and might work well.

Remember that a boat is always a compromise. A heavily
modified boat is a compromise between the original
compromiseand a your new ideas. It is your own boat,
and it is you who will have to live with it. Don't let
us naysayers put you completely off. But watch out, it
is also your own life you are risking, and possibly your
dear ones as well!

Good luck!

 -Heikki
Jere Lull - 08 Jul 2008 05:18 GMT
> I've got an old boat very much like this one:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> shouldn't that take care of it? If so, should they be placed on the
> sides, or in the center?

Judging from friends' boats of about that configuration, I'd suggest
something quite a bit lighter: a light hard roof and tarps, screen and
plastic for  removable "walls", a pop-top camper of sorts.

That said, a friend was for a time a "slum landlord" of a number of
"floating structures" in Key West that were about what I hear you
saying. They (mostly) stayed afloat for some years and weathered some
nasty weather.

Have to say that the inhabitants were not thought well of, though, and
the "boats" uniformly disliked by all. Ugly doesn't begin to say it.

Signature

Jere Lull
Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD
Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/
Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/

mmc - 10 Jul 2008 14:51 GMT
> I've got an old boat very much like this one:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> that take care of it? If so, should they
> be placed on the sides, or in the center?

Pontoon boats make pretty good house boats. I checked out a 22' that the
owner had built up about 2/3s the deck space with house and a patio roof
over the open front. He used that sandwiched foam/aluminum patio roofing and
it came out real well. Kinda looked like a floating trailer, but it served
his purposes.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.