Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsBoatsPaddle BoatsSailingCruisingBuildingElectronics
Related Topics
CarsMotorcyclesMore Topics ...

Boat Forum / Building / May 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

side decks

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dave - 25 May 2005 00:17 GMT
i have a 38 rival sailboat with solid glass side decks. on top of the
deck was teak which i have removed and im almost finished fairing.i
plan on using interlux brightside witn intergrip added for non skid
properties. with the deck being solid glass there is some flexing when
i walk on the deck. does anybody think i will have problems with the
paint cracking or falling off? under the deck the hull to deck joint is
glassed together with about 6 inches of overlap then a small stringer
running from stern to bow,then there is about 6 or 7 inches of solid
glass until you reach another stringer at the edge before the radius to
form the coach sides then roof. the flexing is mostly in the 6 or 7
inches between the hull to deck joint and the radius. im sure teak had
no structural purpose only non skid and looks. if anybody has any
advice or comments it would be greatly appreciated. shpuld i ad more
glass under the deck? and more stringers running from the deck joint to
the inner edge? or perhaps core the entire area between all the
bulkheads? or just leave it be and hope the paint does nt crack or peel
off.
Lew Hodgett - 25 May 2005 00:35 GMT
> with the deck being solid glass there is some flexing when
> i walk on the deck. does anybody think i will have problems with the
> paint cracking or falling off?

<snip>

Don't know about the paint but flexing decks are a problem IMHO.

Lew
dave - 25 May 2005 01:53 GMT
> > with the deck being solid glass there is some flexing when
> > i walk on the deck. does anybody think i will have problems with the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Lew            what is imho? the flexing is only between bulkheads whem you walk on it it feels soft. these boats were designed and built for ocean sailing so i imagin they knew what they were doing. do you think i should reinforce it somehow? any ideas
Lew Hodgett - 25 May 2005 05:21 GMT
>Lew            what is imho? the flexing is only between bulkheads

whem you walk on it it feels soft. these boats were designed and built

for ocean sailing so i imagin they knew what they were doing.

do you think i should reinforce it somehow? any ideas

In My Humble Opinion.

You raise more questions than I can answer at this time.

1) Are the decks cored or solid?

If cored, is the core mushy?

If the decks are solid, do you have an interior head liner covering the
deck glass or is the deck glass directly available from inside the boat?

Questions, questions, questions.

Lew
dave - 25 May 2005 13:41 GMT
> >Lew            what is imho? the flexing is only between bulkheads
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Lew     the decks are solid glass and the headliner panel has been removed so i could remove the deck hardware
Lew Hodgett - 25 May 2005 18:42 GMT
>>Lew    

>the decks are solid glass and the headliner panel has been removed
>so i could remove the deck hardware

The easiest way to stiffen the side decks based on your description
would be to loose fit a piece of foam, say 3/4" Divinycell, to the
underside of the deck, then remove it and glass all exposed foam
surfaces with a couple of layers of 10 oz cloth.

After it cures, install it using some 5200 adhesive.

Allow the 5200 to cure at least a week, then remount all the deck
hardware you had to remove to fit the foam in the first place.

The 5200 will not be as strong as if the foam was glassed directly to
the bottom of the side deck; however, it should be strong enough and it
eliminates trying to lay glass overhead.

Lew
dave - 26 May 2005 01:21 GMT
> >>Lew
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Lew                that sounds like a good idea. should i glass both sides of  the foam? i think i might use my left over west system epoxy thickend with 404 high density filler. im not sure ill have to measure but 3/4 will probably be to thick because of the amount of space between the headliner and deck plus i have to fit bolts in the area. the only deck hardware is a genoa track which i might move closer to the hull to deck joint overlap which is 7-8 inches in that area, all other hardware was placed in the overlap area where the deck seems very strong. i might have to go with 3/8 divivycell. do you think the heat from the epoxy kikking off might damage the primer or paint? thanks for all your help. i might be abel to get some kladgucel localy is this the same type product.
Lew Hodgett - 26 May 2005 03:19 GMT
>>>>Lew
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>
>>Lew                that sounds like a good idea.

>should i glass both sides of  the foam?

Reread and understand my previous post.

i think i might use my left over west system epoxy thickend with 404

high density filler.

Use it for fairing compound, it is not laminating resin.

>im not sure ill have to measure but 3/4 will probably be to thick

because of the amount of space between the headliner and deck plus i

have to fit bolts in the area.

You need to allow 1" of gap between deck glass and head liner to cover
the foam + the glass on both sides of the foam.

I won't bore you with moment of inertia calculations but the stiffness
of a member varies as the cube of the thickness.

Thickness is good.

If that is a problem, sh.t can the head liner and fair out the foam and
glass to look right in this area.

Forget it, see above.

>do you think the heat from the epoxy kikking off might damage

>the primer or paint?

Not if you do it my way.

>i might be abel to get some kladgucel

Do you mean Klegcell?

>localy is this the same type product.

If so, yes.

Lew
dave - 25 May 2005 01:55 GMT
> > with the deck being solid glass there is some flexing when
> > i walk on the deck. does anybody think i will have problems with the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Lew
James - 25 May 2005 07:08 GMT
>i have a 38 rival sailboat with solid glass side decks. on top of the
. im sure teak had no structural purpose only non skid and looks.

On what basis are you sure the teak had no structural purpose?
Teak is a VERY strong and stable timber
dave - 25 May 2005 13:47 GMT
the teak was only 3/16 of an inch. if it was meant to be structural
wouldnt it need to be thicker. and it was advertised by the builderas
an add on for a traditional look, saying nothing about strength.
Paul Oman - 30 May 2005 13:40 GMT
>i have a 38 rival sailboat with solid glass side decks. on top of the
>deck was teak which i have removed and im almost finished fairing.i
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>  

Are you sure the decks are solid glass? Generally they have a wood or
foam core and flexing decks means water has gotten to the wood core and
there is disbondment (and probably rot too). Correct fix it to
completely take apart, but just about everyone simply injects thin
solvent free epoxy that will bond to damp surfaces into holes drilled
into the deck down to the cure material.

Signature

 "Living on Earth is expensive, but it does include
      a free trip around the Sun every year."


  ============================================
  PAUL OMAN   Progressive Epoxy Polymers, Inc.
  Frog Pond Hollow - 48 Wildwood Drive
  Pittsfield NH 03263
  10:30-3:30 Monday-Thur EST 603-435-7199
  VISA/MC/Discover/Paypal
  info@epoxyproducts.com
  http://www.epoxyproducts.com 
  ============================================

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.