The subject is complex, because it stems around one unavaoidable problem,
the difference in thermal expansion and contraction rates between steel and
wood. The difference can be as much as a millimeter per foot of deck. So, if
the wood is fastened directly to the steel, extreme pressures are created
that can split the wood or visibly warp the deck in bright sunlight. If the
deck is allowed to move over the steel, the abrasion will rub any corrosion
protection from the steel and rust is the result. This rust becomes
untreatable without removing the wood. I have tried many systems and all
have their own unique difficulties. In your case, only the complete removal
of the deck will reveal the method used. I could write a treatise on this
subject, but it is safe to say that no method that I am aware of works well.
Steve
> I'v been to look at my uncle's boat a De Ruyter 35' steel motor boat
> based on the Thames, I'm a trades man and he want me to fix his teak
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Does any body have any experience of the type of system
> I would appreciate any help. Cheers Martin
Brian Whatcott - 11 Jul 2006 05:13 GMT
>The subject is complex, because it stems around one unavaoidable problem,
>the difference in thermal expansion and contraction rates between steel and
>wood. The difference can be as much as a millimeter per foot of deck.
Yowza! 1 mm per ft run is 1 part in 305 thermal expansivity
difference between wood and steel.
That's not what it says in the data tables. What am I missing?
What temperature range do you have in mind?
Brian Whatcott Altus OK
Andina Marie - 11 Jul 2006 14:53 GMT
The problem with teak and steel, and even teak and fiberglass, is not
so much thermal expansion but the teak changes in dimension
dramatically with moisture content. It swells and shrinks like a
cellulose sponge with sufficient force to crack or separate from non
flexible adhesives like epoxy.
Caulking or re-caulking should always be done when the teak is
thoroughly dry - which can take a month or two in the sun. That way
when it gets wet it will apply compression force to the caulking and
help improve the seal. If you caulk to teak that has not been
thoroughly dried, then when it does dry and shrink it pulls away from
the caulking and creates a leak.
If you can't wait until it is thoroughly dry, then your caulking
grooves should be made wider - at least 1/4 inch - so the caulking
material can flex far enough that it doesn't pull away from the teak.
A narrow caulk can't stretch that much.
Our decks are fastened from below with screws. The holes in the steel
beams are over sized to allow the teak to "breathe". This is the best
method I've found for securing a teak deck. The only problem we have
is the 1.5" thick teak in 1960 is now 1.25 due to nincompoops sanding
the deck and the tips of the screws are approaching the top surface of
the teak. Where they reach the surface you have a leak and rot/rust
starting.
The same philosophy applies to gluing a thinner teak to a substrate -
wood or fiberglass. Veneer teak is too thin to screw from below so
choose an adhesive that has good flexibility, good adhesion to both
surfaces and is laid thick enough to allow differential expansion with
moisture content without breaking loose. My choice is regular silicone
rubber cement. It handles CLEAN teak fairly well even if there is
residual teak oil present, and is compatible with most other sub deck
materials.
Courtney Thomas - 16 Jul 2006 18:18 GMT
> The problem with teak and steel, and even teak and fiberglass, is not
> so much thermal expansion but the teak changes in dimension
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> residual teak oil present, and is compatible with most other sub deck
> materials.
Pardon my lack of imagination, but I don't follow your description of
screwing the teak decking to steel beams from below. In particular, how
exactly do the screws fasten the wood to the beam, if the beam holes are
over sized ?
Thanks once again,
Courtney
searoom - 24 Jul 2006 21:30 GMT
> > The problem with teak and steel, and even teak and fiberglass, is not
> > so much thermal expansion but the teak changes in dimension
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> Thanks once again,
> Courtney
The heads of the screws hold the deck to the beams. the oversized holes
allow the threaded part of the screw to move with the movement of the
wood/steel interface.
Steve Lusardi - 11 Jul 2006 20:44 GMT
Brian,
I really wish it ain't so, but it is. This isn't tables talking, it's
personal experience. I see it every summer. My deck visibly buckles in the
hot sun. Hose it down with water and it dissapears.
Steve
>>The subject is complex, because it stems around one unavaoidable problem,
>>the difference in thermal expansion and contraction rates between steel
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Brian Whatcott Altus OK
>I'v been to look at my uncle's boat a De Ruyter 35' steel motor boat
>based on the Thames, I'm a trades man and he want me to fix his teak
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Does any body have any experience of the type of system
>I would appreciate any help. Cheers Martin
If the rot isn't too extensive you might consider one of the Epoxy
products like Git Rot or System 3's Fix Rot I've had good results with
System 3. It might save you having to remove the under layment. Jim
CS - 25 Jul 2006 17:30 GMT
You could change to Flextek - the teak substitute that is plastic.
I reckon a teak on ply deck lasts 10 years before it starts to really
lift away. Rip it all off and paint the deck and use decking tiles
where people want to sit around.
CS - 25 Jul 2006 17:31 GMT
You could change to Flextek - the teak substitute that is plastic.
I reckon a teak on ply deck lasts 10 years before it starts to really
lift away. Rip it all off and paint the deck and use decking tiles
where people want to sit around.