Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsBoatsPaddle BoatsSailingCruisingBuildingElectronics
Related Topics
CarsMotorcyclesMore Topics ...

Boat Forum / Building / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

3 phase AC bow thruster??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
CS - 17 Nov 2006 23:55 GMT
I am toying with the idea of driving a bow thruster with a 3 phase AC
motor and wonder if any one else has any experience in this field.

I have a genset that is 1 and 3 phase and a sail drive leg already
fitted with a 3 blade 12" kaplan prop - not exactly sure of pitch but
it is BT prop.
Vessel is 22m steel and displacement 65 tons. A friend in similar sized
vessel has a 5.5 kw motor, so I was planning on the same and either a 4
or 6 pole - so 1500 or 1000 rpm. I think that a 5.5 kw AC motor will
have the same end effect as a 10/12HP engine.

A reversing contactor is the easy part but my queries are:

whether to have a braked motor or not and

whether to feed the 3 phase through an AC drive??

I understand that an AC drive can incorporate a braking function, but I
think using a drive may just overcomplicate it all.

I guess that when the motor is switched off, it will stop pretty
quickly with the prop, so a braked motor may not be necessary.

The alternative is to use a DC 24v motor at 200-300A which will turn at
1440 rpm, so much the same power. Powered from battery and with
dedicated battery charger. DC motor is quite expensive option.

AC option will require me to start genset each time, DC option requires
battery and charger. Plenty of other vessels have a small diesel engine
driving BT, so starting genset is not an issue and I do not use the BT
all the time - did not use it for 2 weeks bringing vessel back from
Netherlands to UK along canals.
Lew Hodgett - 18 Nov 2006 00:18 GMT
RE: Subject

If you want it to survive, as well as be safe, forget electric, go
hydraulic.

Lew
CS - 18 Nov 2006 00:42 GMT
> RE: Subject
>
> If you want it to survive, as well as be safe, forget electric, go
> hydraulic.
>
> Lew

Thanks - but for variety of reasons hydraulic is ruled out.
Richard van den Berg - 18 Nov 2006 09:44 GMT
> I am toying with the idea of driving a bow thruster with a 3 phase AC
> motor and wonder if any one else has any experience in this field.

I just finished composing one:
http://qatsi.ath.cx/cgi-bin/foto/438/53.jpg from
http://qatsi.ath.cx/cgi-bin/foto/414/45.jpg and
http://qatsi.ath.cx/cgi-bin/foto/408/76.jpg
The motor is 4kW 400 VAC 2845 rpm, the bowthruster is from a Vetus
95 kgf type, both bought second hand.

> I have a genset that is 1 and 3 phase and a sail drive leg already
> fitted with a 3 blade 12" kaplan prop - not exactly sure of pitch but
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> or 6 pole - so 1500 or 1000 rpm. I think that a 5.5 kw AC motor will
> have the same end effect as a 10/12HP engine.

5.5 kW is about 7.4 hp, is your friend satisfied with it?

> A reversing contactor is the easy part but my queries are:

> whether to have a braked motor or not and

I would prefer a time delay over a brake.

> whether to feed the 3 phase through an AC drive??

Is the most beautiful solution.

> I understand that an AC drive can incorporate a braking function, but I
> think using a drive may just overcomplicate it all.

If you or someone close is comfortable with a drive, well with a
joystick you have a very smooth control.

> I guess that when the motor is switched off, it will stop pretty
> quickly with the prop, so a braked motor may not be necessary.

Exactly and that is also why bowthruster suppliers have a time delay
option.

> The alternative is to use a DC 24v motor at 200-300A which will turn at
> 1440 rpm, so much the same power. Powered from battery and with
> dedicated battery charger. DC motor is quite expensive option.

> AC option will require me to start genset each time, DC option requires
> battery and charger. Plenty of other vessels have a small diesel engine
> driving BT, so starting genset is not an issue and I do not use the BT
> all the time - did not use it for 2 weeks bringing vessel back from
> Netherlands to UK along canals.

Best thing is do the math. My frequency controllor cost me a "thank
you", normally the most expensive part, hours on it say enough:
http://qatsi.ath.cx/cgi-bin/foto/438/44.jpg more pictures at
http://qatsi.ath.cx/cgi-bin/cath_pub?7 and other pages.

What happened with the Silette Sonic?

Signature

Richard
e-mail: vervang/replace invalid door/with NL.net

CS - 18 Nov 2006 19:53 GMT
> What happened with the Silette Sonic?

The Silette Sonic leg is installed - it is just deciding what to drive
it with.
Richard van den Berg - 18 Nov 2006 21:55 GMT
> The Silette Sonic leg is installed - it is just deciding what to drive
> it with.

Now it's clear for me.;-) All the best with your choice.

Signature

Richard
e-mail: vervang/replace invalid door/with NL.net

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.