Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsBoatsPaddle BoatsSailingCruisingBuildingElectronics
Related Topics
CarsMotorcyclesMore Topics ...

Boat Forum / Building / August 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

BMW K1200 POWERED JET BOAT

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
tobydejong@connect.com.fj - 11 Aug 2007 04:46 GMT
I have a seadoo 1800 jet boat it has 2, 85 HP Rotax 2 stroke motors in
it and runs about 45 Mph
only problem is it uses so much fuel you can drain the 150 lt tank in
2 hours at WOT.
I would love to replace thes 2 strokes with 4 strokes I was thinking
of BMW K1200 motors.
I think they would fit the only problem I see is a cooling system
because I use it in salt water.
also the K1200 is rated at around 150 HP so the extra speed would be
nice.

Does anyone have any ideas of has anyone tried this sort of thing ?
Shaun Van Poecke - 11 Aug 2007 07:41 GMT
Here's the short of it;

Not a good idea!

There are plenty of reasons, search the archives for things like 'marinise
engine' etc but the basics of it come down to the fact that most marine
engines are rated to do their hp continuously while most road engines are
rated for periodic (maybe not the right term?) use.  Apart from all the
normal issues that you might have (cooling, salt water corrosion etc etc)
you also have to worry about mating the engines up to the jet drive unit,
but then the bike engines are designed to have their torque curve throughout
the rev range while marine engines usually have most of it at the top.

Jet drive vessels are pretty bad for fuel efficiency just the same.  When i
was in the coastguard in new zealand we had a 6 litre V8 jet boat as our
first response vessel and it really did chew through the petrol.  Running
two 1200cc engines at WOT constantly you're going to be sucking gas no
matter how you slice it.

My guess is that even if you already had the two engines, or could get them
for free, with what you would spend on doing all the conversions for heat
exchangers etc, custom fittings, machining, etc etc you could probably sell
your existing ride and buy a better jet ski.  On top of that, I dont think
the beemer engines would have a long life living in the ocean.  Plus,
without going too far into it you just dont get anything for free.  Four
strokes are heavier for the same HP as two strokes, so you would either end
up with less power or more weight, and if you had the same power then you
are probably going to use the same amount of fuel anyway.  If you end up
with more power then you would almost definitely end up with more weight,
then you have to start looking at the centre of ballance for your ride,
which would probably move.  Worse case scenario; you may not have enough
reserve bouyancy to carry the extra weight so you may lose the capacity to
carry a passenger.

But if you are going to do it, go with twin hayabusa's, then turbocharge
them  ;-)

Shaun

>I have a seadoo 1800 jet boat it has 2, 85 HP Rotax 2 stroke motors in
> it and runs about 45 Mph
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Does anyone have any ideas of has anyone tried this sort of thing ?
tobydejong@connect.com.fj - 12 Aug 2007 10:37 GMT
On Aug 11, 6:41 pm, "Shaun Van Poecke" <shaunvanpoe...@bigpond.com>
wrote:
> Here's the short of it;
>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>
> > Does anyone have any ideas of has anyone tried this sort of thing ?

Thanks Shaun for your thaughts I agree with most of what you say.
The weight factor is not a problem the BMW motor is about 30 KG more
but the boat is a large volume and can handle it.
I wonder if I can replace them with the new 4 stroke Jet boat motors?
I am an Australian living in Fiji and just selling the boat and
replacing it is much harder than it sounds.
I think their are only 2 or 3 of these boats in Fiji.
and bringing in a new or second hand boat is a big cost, duity is 27%
+ big freight costs.
I could just pay the huge fuel bill each time I use it $1,98 per lt
here in Fiji thats around $300 to go boating for the day.
It would cost less in the long run but their is also the fact that the
enjoyment factor of 2 strokes is low for me they stink their dirty and
they are loud.
I only wish I had a single Jet it would make any mod alot easer.
If anyone has any ideas please feel free to let me know.

Thanks

Toby
Matt Colie - 14 Aug 2007 00:55 GMT
> On Aug 11, 6:41 pm, "Shaun Van Poecke" <shaunvanpoe...@bigpond.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>
> Toby

What is the pay-back time (in hours) of this engine adaptation?
(Assume it uses 1/2 the fuel of the Rotax - Wrong - maybe 3/4 at the
same power level and these can crank out more.)

My bet is it won't pay out this decade.  If the new engines were free,
by the time you get the parts made (heat exchangers, water cooled
exhaust manifolds, engine mounts and drive adapters - just for
starters), you will find you could have had a new boat freighted in.

You have two problems.  2-strokes are problematic when it comes to part
throttle fuel consumption - many use almost as much fuel at 1/2 as they
do at WOT.  The other thing is that the jet drive efficiency is
typically in the single digits.  A very good small boat propeller is
maybe near to 50%.

Good Luck Guy

Matt Colie - Naval Architect Marine Engineer with alphabet soup
Lifelong Waterman and Licensed Mariner
John Cassara - 12 Aug 2007 14:58 GMT
Why not act a little grown up and run at 3/4 throttle for most of your ride.
Save's fuel, wear and tear on the engines drives and you. The people around
you may also like you a little more.

>I have a seadoo 1800 jet boat it has 2, 85 HP Rotax 2 stroke motors in
> it and runs about 45 Mph
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Does anyone have any ideas of has anyone tried this sort of thing ?
justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com - 13 Aug 2007 19:09 GMT
> Why not act a little grown up and run at 3/4 throttle for most of your ride.
> Save's fuel, wear and tear on the engines drives and you. The people around
> you may also like you a little more.
>
> <tobydej...@connect.com.fj> wrote in message

I did not see anything there in his post that would suggest he has
problems with others. What's your point? You don't like fast boats? We
get that. Do what I do, I go to places where there are speed limits,
that's all. Sharing resources is a big part of boating, if you were
nicer to folks, maybe someone would take you on a fast boat too.
Drew Dalgleish - 13 Aug 2007 21:26 GMT
Maybe a fuel flow meter would help you decide how hard you want to
push your engines. Most engines have an enrichment circuit that comes
on at full throttle backing off even a bit can save a lot of gas.
John Cassara - 14 Aug 2007 12:48 GMT
Thank you for your small minded response!

I have owned several fast boats, 80+mph boats. I was a marine mechanic for
more years than I care to explain and have run most every kind of boat from
grossly overpowered 18 footers to twin engine floating hotels. It is common
knowledge the jet boat and jet ski community carry negative appeal with
other boaters. Many jurisdictions are imposing greater operating restriction
on theses vessels. These negatives have been brought on by the operators of
theses vessels. I won't go into it any further!

>> Why not act a little grown up and run at 3/4 throttle for most of your
>> ride.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> that's all. Sharing resources is a big part of boating, if you were
> nicer to folks, maybe someone would take you on a fast boat too.
justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com - 14 Aug 2007 14:14 GMT
> Thank you for your small minded response!
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

You ranted on a guy asking a question. You threw a couple of lame
insults. It was uncalled for, period. I won't go into it any
further ,,|,,
John Cassara - 15 Aug 2007 04:41 GMT
>> Thank you for your small minded response!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> insults. It was uncalled for, period. I won't go into it any
> further ,,|,,

I do believe it was only you who found insult. I quote the direct email
response I received from the original poster:

>>That's exactly what I do I could not afford to run WOT but she still
likes to drink.<<

He responds with no resentment and in fact agrees with what I have said. So
take off your internet police cap and return to your lurking position!
justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com - 15 Aug 2007 14:12 GMT
> <justwaitafrekinmin...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Boy, you are a real hero! <plonk>...
OldNick - 15 Aug 2007 14:38 GMT
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:12:28 -0000, justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com

Please don't stop. Only a couple more layers and we get to Nazi and
shithead...D'OH!

>Boy, you are a real hero! <plonk>...

Human bevaviour: Bestiality with a brain
justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com - 15 Aug 2007 15:17 GMT
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:12:28 -0000, justwaitafrekinmin...@gmail.com
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Human bevaviour: Bestiality with a brain

Nice try troll.
tobydejong@connect.com.fj - 18 Aug 2007 22:30 GMT
On Aug 16, 2:17 am, justwaitafrekinmin...@gmail.com wrote:

> > On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:12:28 -0000, justwaitafrekinmin...@gmail.com
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Nice try troll.

I will not be doing the motor change just now It could be done im sure
but it will take time and lots of money and R&D
thanks for all your advice I will let you know when I start.

Regards
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.