Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsBoatsPaddle BoatsSailingCruisingBuildingElectronics
Related Topics
CarsMotorcyclesMore Topics ...

Boat Forum / Cruising / June 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Another attack on yacht in Venezuela

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Peter Hendra - 17 Jun 2005 01:51 GMT
Another yacht assault in Venezuela

Created by doina. Last modified on 2005-05-26 11:33:16
Contributors:
Topic: Piracy
Countries: Venezuela

The catamaran "Madam", a Bahia 46, with owners Bruno and his wife
Catherine on board, was anchored in Carenero, Venezuela, a hundred
yards or so from the Carenero Yacht Club.

On May 13 2005, at 2am, we were boarded by two young local guys, there
was probably a third one waiting in a small boat. They stole
binoculars, shoes and some portable electronics. Bruno woke-up and
fought with them, taking from them a bat and a hammer they were using
as weapons. One of the two thieves wanted to kill him ("lo mato!")
with a knife but the other said to leave. They jumped in the water and
left, taking the gear and leaving their knife in the cockpit.

We then heard a shot and impact of a projectile in the water close to
the boat. We called for help on CH16: after some time, some local
"vigilancia" relayed the call in better spanish but no authority
responded or showed up. Only the private guards of the nearby hotel
called us and told us we could come anchor a hundred yards closer to
them. We later learned that the Guardia Nacional sent a patrol on
shore, but had no boat to come close to us.

Despite numerous "mayday" calls between 2:10am and 6:00am no authority
responded on CH16.

Around 7am in the morning, Bruno went to see the Guardia Nacional
ashore: they finally made it to the boat at 10:15am, took our
deposition and the evidences of armed robbery left by the thieves: a
big knife and a 3ft bat. Later came an officer from the "Capitania de
Puerto Carenero" who wrote a report of the incident. To this hour,
both have been very reluctant to give us any copy, even that of our
own deposition.

We invite you to broadcast this information as widely as possible in
the hope to get more efficient reactions from the Venezuelian
authorities.

Bruno and Catherine Millet
rhys - 17 Jun 2005 06:40 GMT
Thanks for this. Normally, I don't post salty language, but I've just
added Venezuela to my list of f.cking dumps I won't be visiting by
sail.

So far:

Indonesia
All of the Red Sea
Venezuela
Parts of Brazil
Parts of Africa
Parts of Central America (Costa Rica's still OK, and possibly Belize)
U.S.A. if the jumped-up mall cops running "Homeland Security" think I
might visit Cuba at some undefined point and decide that's reason to
steal my boat.

R.

>Another yacht assault in Venezuela
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
>Bruno and Catherine Millet
Frank - 17 Jun 2005 09:26 GMT
Oh, yeah, gotta ditto this. Yes, even the part about the U.S., despite
my status as a citizen of said entity. We're getting ready to start
cruising toward the Caribbean in a coupla months (as soon as we get the
new boat ready). We'll be flying a "world" flag from our stern.

"Homeland Security!" Snort! A bureau name (and philosophy and tactics)
straight out of the Third Reich. And is there anything more
"unamerican" than the soi-disant "Patriot" Act? Lately, however, I've
been hearing rumors of impeachment. I can only hope. Guess I'd better
keep a U.S. ensign with the other courtesy flags. Just in case.

But to move away from politics... Homeschooling at sea! I can't wait!
The kids are pretty excited, too.
Larry W4CSC - 17 Jun 2005 14:21 GMT
> But to move away from politics... Homeschooling at sea! I can't wait!
> The kids are pretty excited, too.

Here's a good link I found:
http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/schools/homeschools.asp

I have some liveaboard friends who home schooled two boys with a program
from the Univerity of Nebraska-Lincoln:
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Independence Study High School
Tel: (402) 472-2175
Fax: (866) 700-4747
mentioned on this website.  Both boys went on to earn masters degrees being
automatically accepted at UNeb upon successful completion of the remote-
controlled high school.  I looked at some of the correspondence materials
they used.  Most impressive.  World travelers, the boys got lots more
experience at sea than any kid in the finest private school in the country.  
What they lacked was socialization with their generation, as do most home
schoolers, which is not good.

Signature

Larry

You know you've had a rough night when you wake up and your outlined in
chalk.

Frank - 17 Jun 2005 19:04 GMT
Thanks, Larry,

We're John Holt-style *un*schoolers. As such, we reject the concept of
curricula of any kind. And I say that as a product of a fairly rigorous
schooling experience myself, including a college major in secondary
education.

And the "socialization" argument is, to be blunt, bogus. Homeschooled
kids get more and better socialization than schooled kids, who are kept
quiet in their desks 6 or more hours a day and segregated solely with
their own age group, except during recess, when they get beat up by
older bullies. How in the world is that "better socialization" than
interacting with various people of various age groups in the real
world, just like we hafta do as adults? If you observe homeschooled
kids and schooled kids of the same age group in a social setting, I
contend that you'll find the homeschooled kids to be universally better
socialized and more comfortable with others (of all ages) than the
schooled kids.

And that's my $.02 on THAT subject! <grin>

Frank, fato profugus
prodigal1 - 17 Jun 2005 20:13 GMT
> Thanks, Larry,
>
> We're John Holt-style *un*schoolers.

sweeping generalizations about school snipped

The "socialization" I'd be more concerned about is the programming they
get in US society to be unquestioning little consumers.  It isn't the
schools that teach kids to be sheep.  It's so-called "popular culture"
which is of course nothing more than advertising for consumer goods.
Frank - 17 Jun 2005 22:03 GMT
I agree pretty much with your assessment of our culture, such as it is.
I  think that the schools are part of the indoctrination process,
however. Look at your own wording, "...teach the kids to be sheep."
Where do kids spend most of their day being herded around, told what to
do, told to be quiet, told when to think, and what to think, but not to
think too much. Actually having an original thought and questioning
something a teacher says is the rankest form of breaking from the herd
and results in instant and complete ostracism.

Do you disagree with my sweeping generalizations about school?
FMac - 17 Jun 2005 23:01 GMT
> I agree pretty much with your assessment of our culture, such as it is.
> I  think that the schools are part of the indoctrination process,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Do you disagree with my sweeping generalizations about school?

Yes, somewhat.  I always thought it was the sheep attempting to lead the
wolfs.  I still think that way.
prodigal1 - 18 Jun 2005 04:30 GMT
> I agree pretty much with your assessment of our culture, such as it is.
> I  think that the schools are part of the indoctrination process,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> something a teacher says is the rankest form of breaking from the herd
> and results in instant and complete ostracism.
off the top of my head
the pros
1.  I think you are speaking from your own experience with a school
system that didn't meet your needs.
2.  You correctly want to protect your children from the same unhappy
experience you had.
3.  It's possible you are/were a "gifted" person.

the cons
1.  Your experience may not be your kids experience.
2.  Kids need to experience life for themselves, which isn't to say that
they need to experience "school".  I think there's a lot to be said for
getting out there.  I just don't buy this "home-schooled makes better
kids" crap.  My in-laws home-school their kids in a Baptist ghetto.
They're 2 years behind their peers in basic skills and if it ain't about
 Jesus, it ain't bein' discussed in the home.  OMG!!!!  Are all
2.5billion of the Chinese and Indian's going straight to hell because
"they don't _know_ Jesus"?  Going to get kinda crowded down there don't
you think?
3.  Your criticism of "school" is predicated on a presumption that it
exists, perhaps based on your experience, to stifle the creative
expresssion of intelligence.  All I can say is that my experience, and
my kid's experience was different...but then I didn't go to school in
the US.
4.  Kids don't know anything yet...they're kids...even if they are gifted.
5.  Most teachers do have something to say, motivated by a desire to
invigorate the minds of children.  God knows they don't go into teaching
for the money, so cut them a little slack.

> Do you disagree with my sweeping generalizations about school?

ah...as a rule, I think sweeping generalizations are intellectually
unsupportable.

conclusion
take 'em sailing
life's short
enjoy
Larry W4CSC - 18 Jun 2005 13:52 GMT
> My in-laws home-school their kids in a Baptist ghetto.
> They're 2 years behind their peers in basic skills and if it ain't about
>   Jesus, it ain't bein' discussed in the home.  OMG!!!!  Are all
> 2.5billion of the Chinese and Indian's going straight to hell because
> "they don't _know_ Jesus"?  Going to get kinda crowded down there don't
> you think?

My point, exactly.  Noone is protecting the kids in these Jesus Ghettos
from the brainwashing.  My next door neighbor is 35.  He was brought up in
a World Church of God ghetto by a domineering mother.  He's all screwed up
from it and no amount of counseling has helped him heal the scars she
caused him all his young life.

He'd have been much healthier screwing around with Mary Lou under the
football bleachers than having his head blown off by the Guilt Freaks For
Jesus.

Signature

Larry

You know you've had a rough night when you wake up and your outlined in
chalk.

Brian Whatcott - 18 Jun 2005 14:30 GMT
>> My in-laws home-school their kids in a Baptist ghetto.
>> They're 2 years behind their peers in basic skills and if it ain't about
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>football bleachers than having his head blown off by the Guilt Freaks For
>Jesus.

Hmmm...the statistics that I've stumbled across suggest that religous
schools in general produce students that score ahead of regular school
students on measures of academic achievement.

I expect Larry has the data to back his views. He couldn't be
operating simply on the basis of opinion  even prejudioce, surely?

:-)

Brian Whatcott
Frank - 19 Jun 2005 07:52 GMT
Whoa, guys! You call me on "sweeping generalizations" then reduce all
homeschooling to radical right-wing self-flagellating flat-earthers
brainwashing their kids in ghettos. Let's try to find a little balance
here. I certainly agree that *that* is not education; public school is
infinitely superior. Ok? Larry, I couldn't agree more that I'd rather
see a kid "discovering life" under the bleachers than having the kind
of experience you related.

Prodigal, you admit that you didn't even go to school in the US; but
you're arguing with my comments. I not only attended school here, I was
a teacher. Briefly. I admire teachers; I detest bureaucrats. Guess who,
IMO, runs the schools and sets policies? I was pretty happy with my
kids' school system. They attended for about three years. After first
grade, they were, as you guessed, in gifted classes, where the entrance
requirement was 98th %ile, i.e. MENSA level. (Where's Jax when you need
him?) But homeschooling is much more fun and much more flexible.
Whether a kid is "gifted" (however you define that) or not has no
bearing on it. I *like* being with my kids. If you don't really like
kids, homeschooling is definitely not the way you wanna go.

Yes, I admit that, by the common school system definition, I was gifted
(triple nine), as was my wife; and both girls are 99-plus, as well as
they can measure that at their age. I had a wonderful education,
courtesy of the Jesuits, not the US public school system. My wife's
comments about her education in the US public school system can't be
repeated in polite company.

But agruing about giftedness is just a distraction. *Every kid*
deserves to be nutured, not squashed. By your own admission, you are
ignorant of the US school system. Don't take my opinion, then; look
into it yourself. It's *at least* as bad as I paint it. There's a
Japanese saying which applies perfectly to the way we "school" kids:
the nail that stands up gets hammered down.

Frank - IMO, FWIW, YMMV, etc.
Frank - 20 Jun 2005 22:00 GMT
Self-followup. I find this tendency ("hammering down") to be a general
one in society, not confined to the school system alone. I add a poem
by our favorite capitalization-impaired poet, ee cummings:

to be nobody but yourself in a world whcih is doing its best, night and
day, to make you everybody else
means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight, and
never stop fighting
rhys - 21 Jun 2005 17:28 GMT
>> Thanks, Larry,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>schools that teach kids to be sheep.  It's so-called "popular culture"
>which is of course nothing more than advertising for consumer goods.

It's not much different anywhere in the Western world, but it's worst
(or most developed a system of persuasion, depending on your POV) in
North America. We figure that an important side benefit of living on a
boat (with occasional school terms ashore in foreign countries) will
help our kid develop the critical thinking skills so he can make his
own choices.

As a marketer/advertising writer, I know how most "choices" are
illusory. Life at sea is a good teacher, by contrast, on how to think
clearly and rationally while maintaining a mystical relationship with
nature and the sea.

R.
Larry W4CSC - 22 Jun 2005 01:03 GMT
> As a marketer/advertising writer, I know how most "choices" are
> illusory. Life at sea is a good teacher, by contrast, on how to think
> clearly and rationally while maintaining a mystical relationship with
> nature and the sea.

Could you have become a "marketer/advertising writer" if you'd spent YOUR
childhood at sea on correspondence courses?....or would you have become one
of those poor slaves hauling out someone's nasty engine from the bilges?

In other words, name 4 very successful people you know who were home
schooled at sea by correspondence course....It's an interesting search.

Signature

Larry

You know you've had a rough night when you wake up and your outlined in
chalk.

Stephen Trapani - 22 Jun 2005 02:31 GMT
>>As a marketer/advertising writer, I know how most "choices" are
>>illusory. Life at sea is a good teacher, by contrast, on how to think
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> childhood at sea on correspondence courses?....or would you have become one
> of those poor slaves hauling out someone's nasty engine from the bilges?

When people do something they really love, they tend to excell at it.
Life at sea doesn't have to consist entirely of just boat related
things. There are correspondence courses and ways to learn almost
anything, considering books, the internet, satellites, etc.

The key advantage of unschooling is that the person is doing something
they really are enthusiastic about. When people do things they love they
tend to master it and move on to other things, or just have fun the rest
of their lives mastering what they mastered, and making a good living at
it even.

The key problem on a boat is the child needs to have opportunities to
explore what interests them. This could present some major challenges to
the homeschooling parent on a boat.

> In other words, name 4 very successful people you know who were home
> schooled at sea by correspondence course....It's an interesting search.

Plenty of very successful people have been homeschooled and unschooled.
You have a point about it being more rare and difficult on a boat, but
it's not impossible. What if they decide to *facilitate* the child's
schooling by, say, going to places for the sake of the that sometimes?

Signature

Stephen

-------

For any proposition there is always some sufficiently narrow
interpretation of its terms, such that it turns out true, and
some sufficiently wide interpretation such that it turns out
false...concept stretching will refute *any* statement, and will
leave no true statement whatsoever.
  -- Imre Lakatos

Frank - 22 Jun 2005 05:26 GMT
Stephen, I like what you're saying and I wanna comment on this:

You said: The key problem on a boat is the child needs to have
opportunities to
explore what interests them. This could present some major challenges
to
the homeschooling parent on a boat.

Hey! Drop the phrase "on a boat." This is the key problem for a
homeschooling parent in New York City, suburban San Diego, or East
Podunk. It's also the key problem for any kid, schooled by any method,
in a school or otherwise.

As for it being a challenge for a homeschooler on a boat, that's
certainly true; but that's what the www is for. However, it's just as
true for a kid sitting at his desk in P.S. 101, prepping for the latest
round of "standardized testing" when what he wants desperately to
investigate is plate tectonics. The difference is that the homeschooler
can tell his folks that and off they go on an exploration of the world
of plate tectonics. Meanwhile, the kid at P.S. 101 is still stuck at
his desk learning how to give the "correct" answers on the latest
"measurement device" (test) to ensure funding under the "no kid is left
behind" extortion scheme. Behind what, I'm not sure.
Stephen Trapani - 22 Jun 2005 06:09 GMT
> Stephen, I like what you're saying and I wanna comment on this:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> "measurement device" (test) to ensure funding under the "no kid is left
> behind" extortion scheme. Behind what, I'm not sure.

Yeah, you're right.

Stephen

Signature

Stephen

-------

For any proposition there is always some sufficiently narrow
interpretation of its terms, such that it turns out true, and
some sufficiently wide interpretation such that it turns out
false...concept stretching will refute *any* statement, and will
leave no true statement whatsoever.
  -- Imre Lakatos

Vito - 22 Jun 2005 13:04 GMT
> Frank wrote:
<snip>

After all the comentary and back slapping nobody responded to Larry's
challenge:
"In other words, name 4 very successful people you know who were home
schooled at sea by correspondence course".

I've done a lot of hiring for well-paying jobs.  Employers want credentials.
Your home-schooled kid may be better educated than the product of PS101 but
do you have a paper that says so, or that (s)he has any education at all.
And if I'm to compare several candidates I want to see scores on
standardized tests.
prodigal1 - 22 Jun 2005 22:17 GMT
<snip>

> And if I'm to compare several candidates I want to see scores on
> standardized tests.

The results of standardized testing provide only at best a simplistic
and at worse, an irrelevant answer to the question you're asking.
I'm always surprised when I see/read people comments indicating that
these blunt instruments have some sort of validity.
rhys - 23 Jun 2005 04:41 GMT
><snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>I'm always surprised when I see/read people comments indicating that
>these blunt instruments have some sort of validity.

OK, time for a definition of terms here: What I am interested in
pursuing is not "homeschooling" in the sense of someone completely off
the radar of a standardized education, but "distance learning",
whereby my kid, living on a boat, is educated to the standards of my
land-based jurisdiction, and receives the standard credits and
credentials.

And, if he proves able, is allowed to accelerate his learning at his
own pace in subjects of his choosing.

This would require flexibility on the part of the issuing schoolboard,
but as I live in a city of several million, and know of several fellow
citizens who've taught kids on boats, AND it is anticipated that my
wife will have earned a teaching certificate by then and herself will
be the "in-house" teacher, I don't think we, with the use of modern
communications, patience and the stimulating environment of the sea,
will have a lot of trouble. The kid's already bright, willfull and
motivated to learn at 3 3/4...I expect he'll be running plots by age
eight <G>.

R.
Vito - 23 Jun 2005 13:33 GMT
> Vito wrote:
> <snip>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> The results of standardized testing provide only at best a simplistic ....

But they are the best we have.  Suppose I have 5 or 6 ap's for one trainee
job.  I don't have time to do an in-depth background check then interview
each of them.  I'm going to pick 1 or 2 that look the best based on their
job ap and resume. If 1 or 2 have diplomas with high grades I'll interview
them and if that goes well hire one of them. The rest won't even get
interviewed.  That's life.
prodigal1 - 24 Jun 2005 02:49 GMT
> I don't have time to do an in-depth background check then interview
> each of them....

jeezus Vito, if _you_ don't have the time to do your due diligence...who
will?  and if you don't...
Vito - 24 Jun 2005 13:59 GMT
> > I don't have time to do an in-depth background check then interview
> > each of them....
>
> jeezus Vito, if _you_ don't have the time to do your due diligence...who
> will?  and if you don't...

I don't owe anybody 'due dilligence'. I just need to hire somebody to do a
job and if (s)he can I'm happy and my boss is happy.  I have my own work to
do. I have neither time nor any obligation to tease an applicants
qualifications out of him. It is up to the applicant to present them and
make them as creditable as possible.  It is a parent's duty to get their
kids the credentials they'll need to succeed as adults.  You wanna go play
instead you shouldn't have had kids.
prodigal1 - 24 Jun 2005 23:39 GMT
> I don't owe anybody 'due dilligence'.

Vito, you owe yourself/your employer _your_ due diligence.  Since you
don't seem to know:
a)  what that means or
b)  what consequences await those who don't take care of their own business,
there's not much more we have to communicate about
Vito - 27 Jun 2005 13:34 GMT
> Vito wrote:
> > I don't owe anybody 'due dilligence'.
>
> Vito, you owe yourself/your employer _your_ due diligence.

Yes - to the extent that I hire qualified, capable employees.  I have been
very successful at doing so.  But NO, I do not owe every applicant an
interview or an in-depth test to determine his/her qualifications.  Rather,
the burden in on the applicant to show me enough potential to be worth
interviewing.

> there's not much more we have to communicate about

True.
Larry W4CSC - 23 Jun 2005 04:46 GMT
> I've done a lot of hiring for well-paying jobs.  Employers want
> credentials. Your home-schooled kid may be better educated than the
> product of PS101 but do you have a paper that says so, or that (s)he
> has any education at all. And if I'm to compare several candidates I
> want to see scores on standardized tests.

And, armed with the information this applicant lived the first 15 years of
his life on a fiberglass island like a hermit....would you think he'd fit
into a busy office, factory, "department" in a large, heavily-populated
business?  I wouldn't.

Home schooling's isolationists are bad enough.  Pile that on top of living
with those independent-minded hermits at the dock and I think you're doing
serious damage to the poor kid.  Take him on a cruise, by all means!  But
make him live years on a boat....NOT.

Signature

Larry

You know you've had a rough night when you wake up and your outlined in
chalk.

lbrty4us@aol.com - 23 Jun 2005 13:30 GMT
> > I've done a lot of hiring for well-paying jobs.  Employers want
> > credentials. Your home-schooled kid may be better educated than the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> serious damage to the poor kid.  Take him on a cruise, by all means!  But
> make him live years on a boat....NOT.

It's almost unspeakably sad, if not revolting, that some of the above
posters have actually been, or are, PARENTS.  But they would never
undersant WHY.
Vito - 24 Jun 2005 13:40 GMT
> It's almost unspeakably sad, if not revolting, that some of the above
> posters have actually been, or are, PARENTS.  But they would never
> undersant WHY.

Try grandparents.  I think it revolting that you are so selfish as to hamper
your kids' futures so you can avoid your obligations to them and go play.
And we do understand - we understand that you think your kids are your pets.
They are not.

I didn't make the rules but without credentials your kids will be
unemployable. Do you care?
lbrty4us@aol.com - 23 Jun 2005 13:30 GMT
> > I've done a lot of hiring for well-paying jobs.  Employers want
> > credentials. Your home-schooled kid may be better educated than the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> serious damage to the poor kid.  Take him on a cruise, by all means!  But
> make him live years on a boat....NOT.

It's almost unspeakably sad, if not revolting, that some of the above
posters have actually been, or are, PARENTS.  But they would never
understand WHY.
Larry W4CSC - 23 Jun 2005 04:42 GMT
> The key problem on a boat is the child needs to have opportunities to
> explore what interests them. This could present some major challenges to
> the homeschooling parent on a boat.

There's the point.  Maybe the child doesn't WANT to live on the boat
without his friends, particularly his girlfriend, without his bike, without
a real neighborhood full of other kids to socialize with.  
But...alas....DADDY DOES and he's forced to go.  He may not tell Daddy he
doesn't want to live on that cramped little isolated island in the middle
of nowhere because he'll cause a fight, hurt daddy's feelings, etc.....but
he's lost interest in the novelty...no TV...no internet...no friends...no
school activities...just living on that deserted desert island of
fiberglass.

Signature

Larry

You know you've had a rough night when you wake up and your outlined in
chalk.

Stephen Trapani - 23 Jun 2005 05:50 GMT
>>The key problem on a boat is the child needs to have opportunities to
>>explore what interests them. This could present some major challenges to
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> school activities...just living on that deserted desert island of
> fiberglass.

Yeah, I'm against that.

Signature

Stephen

-------

For any proposition there is always some sufficiently narrow
interpretation of its terms, such that it turns out true, and
some sufficiently wide interpretation such that it turns out
false...concept stretching will refute *any* statement, and will
leave no true statement whatsoever.
  -- Imre Lakatos

Don W - 23 Jun 2005 18:39 GMT
Larry,

> "just living on that deserted desert island of fiberglass."

Wow!  Based on what you wrote below are you sure that you ever want to go
cruising?  Seems to me that kids on a real cruising boat have a lot of
opportunities to meet and socialize with kids.  What they don't have is
the opportunity to fall in with the wrong crowd and end up stealing cars
or selling drugs to their school chums.

I'll grant you that a "normal" teenager who has been raised on cable TV,
no homework, and unlimited internet/cell phone will be pretty bored while
the boat is getting moved.

BTW, while I was growing up I didn't WANT to live on a farm and have to do
farm chores while my friends were watching TV.  I didn't WANT to run a tractor
and harvester through the summer while my friends were lounging around down
at the swimming pool.  Looking back now though, I see that I'm better off
for it, and I'm glad that my dad was wiser than I was.

Usually, what kids WANT isn't all that good for them.  I'll bet that most
people who ask will find out that their kids don't WANT to go to school.  I
know I didn't ;-)

And BTW, I've never noticed kids being shy about telling Daddy when they're
unhappy either.

YMMV,

Don W.

> There's the point.  Maybe the child doesn't WANT to live on the boat
> without his friends, particularly his girlfriend, without his bike, without
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> school activities...just living on that deserted desert island of
> fiberglass.
Frank - 23 Jun 2005 23:55 GMT
Well, Larry definitely has an idee fixe about homeschooling and I'm not
gonna continue arguing. I will say that if that's how you perceive the
parent/child relationship, you have my sympathy.

As for the isolation and success stuff, even though nobody supplied me
with their definition (Except a couple of folks seemed to imply that
"success" was getting a job as a mushroom in a cube farm. Not my idea
of success but de gustibus non disputandum, eh?), I seem to remember a
homeschooler/sailor named something like Robin Lee Graham (Had a little
boat named "Dove." Ring a bell for anyone?), who sailed completely
alone (not even domineering parents for socialization, oh my!) but
still somehow managed to make friends in various places around the
world and even met a girl and got married!  Mais jamais de ma vie!

The things that can happen on a "deserted desert island of fiberglass."
Amazing, huh?
Vito - 24 Jun 2005 14:05 GMT
> .....I seem to remember a
> homeschooler/sailor named something like Robin Lee Graham (Had a little
> boat named "Dove." Ring a bell for anyone?), who sailed completely
> alone (not even domineering parents for socialization, oh my!) but
> still somehow managed to make friends in various places around the
> world and even met a girl and got married!  Mais jamais de ma vie!

Where did he get the boat?  How did he earn a living - especially in his
doteage?
Frank - 24 Jun 2005 17:53 GMT
Vito,

You don't really want answers; you just wanna confirm your position
that homeschoolers are unworthy of being hired by you. Fine. If you're
doing the hiring, you can set the standards. And feel free to continue
to think that homeschoolers are engaging in selfish behavior, compared
to those who farm their kids out to the school system all day every
day. You wanna have kids, you should be responsible for them and make
some effort on their behalf. You wanna pursue your lame career instead,
you shouldn't have had 'em. (A grandparent and still working? Not very
"successful," are you?)

Just FYI, Graham returned to the US and was accepted to Stanford. This
is, of course, after he wrote his book and worked on several
photographic assignments for National Geographic. Guess National
Geographic isn't as picky as you are in their hiring practices.

He didn't like life at Stanford; and he and his wife moved to Montana.
I have no idea what he's doing nowadays. OTOH, the Colfax family sent
their kids to Harvard and Yale from their homeschooling goat farm in
Northern Callifornia. (_Homeschooling for Excellence_ by David and Miki
Colfax.)

But you're gonna choose to look at any example given about "successful"
homeschooling as a case of abusus non tollit usum. I have other things
to do than sit here and beat this dead horse; so I'm gonna go do 'em.

Happy sailing!

Frank
Vito - 24 Jun 2005 20:34 GMT
> You .... just wanna confirm your position
> that homeschoolers are unworthy of being hired by you.

That is untrue.  I have nothing against home schooling provided the
schooling is adequately documented, thus providing the kids with the
credentials needed to get into colleges and to find employment.  If a kid
were homeschooled, accepted at an accredited university and obtained a
degree I would give him/her the same consideration as anyone else.  What I
am trying to do is to warn parents that these credentials will be needed so
they can aquire them as they go along. If your kid shows up to compete for a
job and has to check the "no" box under "HS Diploma?" on the application
he's going to be at a serious disadvantage no matter how well his mama
schooled him. If you care about your kids that won't happen but you'll have
to do the right things at the right times.
Frank - 22 Jun 2005 05:10 GMT
Larry asks:
> Could you have become a "marketer/advertising writer" if you'd spent YOUR
> childhood at sea on correspondence courses?....

Easily. Much more easily than a typical product of the US lower/high
school system could. Our university system is pretty good, however.

and...
> or would you have become one
> of those poor slaves hauling out someone's nasty engine from the bilges?

Like the employees at the local fast-food place whose math skills are
so pitiful that they can't make change? These people are called "high
school graduates." Same as that poor grunt hauling your oily engine or
grinding your fouled bottom for negligible compensation.

Define "success" for me and we can have an interesting discussion about
that. I'll bet my definition differs greatly from yours. For instance,
mine includes "fun" as one of the more important components.
Jere Lull - 18 Jun 2005 04:18 GMT
> I looked at some of the correspondence materials they used.  Most
> impressive.  World travelers, the boys got lots more experience at
> sea than any kid in the finest private school in the country.   What
> they lacked was socialization with their generation, as do most home
> schoolers, which is not good.

I'm not so sure. The socialization skills of the land-bound leaves a lot
to be desired. My nieces and nephew (now about 25-35) were largely home
schooled and their social skills are better than most of their
contemporaries that I work with. In addition, their values and ethics
are considerably more mature.

In general, the cruising kids I see are better adjusted to the real
world. They definitely know what responsibility is, and why it's
important.

Signature

Jere Lull
Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD)
Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html
Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/

rhys - 21 Jun 2005 17:15 GMT
Thanks, Larry. "Boat-schooling" is something we'll be doing after '08
if the plans hold...picture Skip Gundlach with a seven year old and
twenty years younger!

R.

>> But to move away from politics... Homeschooling at sea! I can't wait!
>> The kids are pretty excited, too.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>What they lacked was socialization with their generation, as do most home
>schoolers, which is not good.
Frank - 21 Jun 2005 23:22 GMT
Hah! For me, picture Skip but with two pre-teen girls and a foot
shorter.
lbrty4us@aol.com - 22 Jun 2005 22:06 GMT
> Oh, yeah, gotta ditto this. Yes, even the part about the U.S., despite
> my status as a citizen of said entity. We're getting ready to start
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> But to move away from politics... Homeschooling at sea! I can't wait!
> The kids are pretty excited, too.

I hope you are keeping them far from the WWW & TV and teaching them the
Mandarin they will soon need to survive in the coming reich.

Another Frank
Former Homeschooler
prodigal1 - 22 Jun 2005 22:20 GMT
> I hope you are keeping them far from the WWW & TV and teaching them the
> Mandarin they will soon need to survive in the coming reich.

???coming reich???
baby, you're living it and you don't even know it.
But I agree, teach them Chinese because it will make them smarter
Don W - 23 Jun 2005 19:21 GMT
{off topic mode on}

See, now this is what really bothers me about the current political
chasm in the world.  All sides seem to be ignorant of history, and make
extreme hyperbolic statements to support their opinions.

The REAL Reich imprisoned, tortured, and murdered somewhat more than
10 MILLION people over a period of about four years.  That is a documented
fact of history.

I don't particularly like where the US and the world are headed right now
either, but equating the USA with the German Reich is purely hyperbole.
Perhaps you prefer the methods of the "Islamic" extremists which include
car bombing civilians, and sawing the heads off of live prisoners??

> ???coming reich???
> baby, you're living it and you don't even know it.

{off topic mode off}

Cruising is how I hope to travel while avoiding removing my shoes for the
security line.  {OTMBOn} Which, BTW, I wouldn't have to do if "muslim"
Richard Reid hadn't tried to murder an entire airplane load of civilians
with the bomb hidden in his shoes.  Sheesh!! {OTMBOff}

My idea of cruising is to travel to the peaceful places in the world where
they are not getting caught up in the current troubles between the western
and islamic worlds.

Don W.
prodigal1 - 24 Jun 2005 03:00 GMT
>snipola<

Don,
You want to take me to task for responding to whatsisname's OT political
comments?
puhllleeeeze
spare me defensiveness
do go cruising on that boat of yours
I think you'll find that the further you get away from the noise, the
clearer your perspective will be on current events
Don W - 24 Jun 2005 07:11 GMT
Prodigal,

{otmon}
No, I don't care about whatever you were responding to.  I was just
making the point that both sides of this political gulf have already
forgotten the hard learned lessons of less than sixty years ago.  So,
I guess that we will all have to re-learn those lessons the hard way.

That we includes the western world, and it includes the islamic world.

And the "sheesh" was aimed at Richard Reid, and the people who inspired
him, not at you.

What I responded to in your post was the comment comparing the current USA
to the German REICH of 1936-45, and saying that we were already living in
it.  We may yet get there (and I really really hope that we don't), but if
we were already there you would have been too scared to make a comment like
that in a public forum--because there _would_ have been a knock at your door in
the night, and the rest of us would never have known what happened to you.
I gather that you are not at all worried about that possibility??  Well then
we must not be there yet.

Defensive??  puhllleeeeze spare me.  I'm just a student of history who has
a grasp on the reality of what happened during our grandparents generation.
It was a lot of really ugly things that all of us should have the sense not
to do again.

{otmoff}

Instead, we should go cruising, and make friends with people all over the
world.  We should smile, and laugh, and dance, and tell jokes.  Sometimes
we should laugh at other peoples lame jokes just because it makes them feel
good.  We should eat good food that we prepared ourselves, and marvel at the
sunsets, and the deep azure blue ocean.  And on that perfect day when the sun
smiles and the winds are fair, we should remember to feel a little sadness for
those who take life too seriously and thus never really get to live it.

Life's blessings and fair winds to you,

Don W.

> Don,
> You want to take me to task for responding to whatsisname's OT political
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I think you'll find that the further you get away from the noise, the
> clearer your perspective will be on current events
Larry W4CSC - 25 Jun 2005 03:05 GMT
> the islamic world.

I've worked in Iran, for the Iranian Air Force under the Shahanshah.  I've
fixed ships in Bahrain from Charleston Naval Shipyard, our Great White
Fleet at Bahrain's port.  I left Iran about 28 days before the Shah did in
'79.  I'd go back next week if they had a friendly government, again.

If you tire of the constant onslaught of Tel Aviv TV telling Americans they
are all just terrorists and want to kill us all, take a little trip to
Mahmood's Blog for fun in Bahrain to see what normal Arab people are really
like.  Mahmood's Blog is in English.  He's a fluent English Arab, probably
trained at the British School in Al Manama or in England.  He has great
videos of all kinds of silly things Bahrainis take quite seriously.  The
video yesterday was about a guy who saves an endangered Bahraini frog that
lives on the desert island the development threatens.

Note how normal Arab people are kinda laid back, not what CNN wants you to
think at all!....hee hee.

http://www.mahmood.tv/

Warning!  His colorful language ISN'T what you hear coming from a
mosque!...(c;  He's getting much better at video productions, of late.  
There's great pointers to other Arab English language blogs from his site,
too.  Bahraini Girl is a good read.  Mahmood's coverage of the Formula 1
racing in Bahrain has some great pictures of beautiful expat and Bahraini
women...without the covering!  Bahrainis tolerate a lot of outside ideas.  
They've had 7000 years of foreign traders to corrupt them...

Signature

Larry

You know you've had a rough night when you wake up and you're outlined in
chalk.

Larry W4CSC - 24 Jun 2005 04:02 GMT
> The REAL Reich imprisoned, tortured, and murdered somewhat more than
> 10 MILLION people over a period of about four years.  That is a
> documented fact of history.

Oh, boy....this'll make the thread EXPLODE!
http://www.nizkor.org/faqs/leuchter/
http://www.ihr.org/books/leuchter/leuchter.toc.html

There....that'll rile 'em....(c;

Signature

Larry

You know you've had a rough night when you wake up and you're outlined in
chalk.

Peter Hendra - 18 Jun 2005 07:53 GMT
>Thanks for this. Normally, I don't post salty language, but I've just
>added Venezuela to my list of f.cking dumps I won't be visiting by
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>might visit Cuba at some undefined point and decide that's reason to
>steal my boat.

Hi,
Having sailed through the Red Sea and parts of Indonesia, don't write
off all of these two great places. The only part of the Red Sea route
where pirate attacks have occurred is in the Gulf of Aden. The Red Sea
itself is very safe apart from having US helicopter gunships hovering
just above one's mast top without identifying themselves and radio
warnings on VHF of the danger of being fired upon by approaching US
warships if we come within 2 miles of them or their convoys in
international waters. Oman, Sudan, Egypt, Eritrea and Aden are very
welcoming and safe, even for those US flagged yachts who traveled
through the year we did (March 2003). By the way, with the "war on
terror", why is it that these patroling warships never respond to a
call for help by yachts and ships under attack but demand that a yacht
identify itself in international waters?

Parts of Indonesia are quite safe, especially the southern part of the
island of Borneo. In other parts one must simply refuse to pay extra
"fees".

I understand that some parts of the US are not safe to visit as there
is a danger of being robbed, mugged or murdered and that some
officials are somewhat corrupt. Perhaps I am misinformed by the news
reports that I have seen and the televised scenes of several police
beating an unarmed black man on the ground. Possibly they were part of
an elaborate Chinese/North Korean plot to discredit the land of the
free and the home of that most advanced piece of democratic
legislation - the Patriot Act, and extraterritorial imprisonment of
foreign nationals. Forgive me for this but I have been wanting to have
a moan for a while now.
lbrty4us@aol.com - 22 Jun 2005 22:03 GMT
> Thanks for this. Normally, I don't post salty language, but I've just
> added Venezuela to my list of f.cking dumps I won't be visiting by
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> might visit Cuba at some undefined point and decide that's reason to
> steal my boat.

One wonders whether this miscreant may have realized that a great many
of the residents of these countries consider his own to be a f.cking
dump, too, except for it's inestimably greater & more universal
arrogance that tempts everyone to rip its vacationers off by any means
available?

People like this guy HELP CAUSE piracy.
rhys - 23 Jun 2005 04:44 GMT
>One wonders whether this miscreant may have realized that a great many
>of the residents of these countries consider his own to be a f.cking
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>People like this guy HELP CAUSE piracy.

So let me get this straight: because you don't like my country (and
which country is that?) and my opinions, it's okay to steal from me
and steal my boat?

What are you, homeschooled?

R.
Stephen Trapani - 22 Jun 2005 20:06 GMT
Vito wrote:

> "Stephen Trapani" <fahgetabowtit@wherever.never> wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I've done a lot of hiring for well-paying jobs.  Employers want
credentials.
> Your home-schooled kid may be better educated than the product of
PS101 but
> do you have a paper that says so, or that (s)he has any education at all.
> And if I'm to compare several candidates I want to see scores on
> standardized tests.

I did answer him, but maybe you'll like this better:

http://www.home4schoolgear.com/famoushomeschooler.html

or this:

http://users.safeaccess.com/olsen/famous.html

or this:

http://www.homeschoolutah.org/pages/pastandpresent.htm

Even on these very incomplete lists you can see there have been plenty
of successful homeschoolers, no matter how you measure "success."

I'm an employer also. What matters most to me is past work experience
and some indication from the person that they can do what I want them to
do. Their schooling is one of the least important things I consider. And
a "standardized test" is worthless unless performance on the test
somehow relates to their prospective job duties. Anyway, most
homeschoolers would do well on such tests. Why wouldn't they?

Signature

Stephen

lbrty4us@aol.com - 22 Jun 2005 21:59 GMT
This is just stupid.  What kind of people invest in a yacht, anchor it
in a foriegn cove, and go to sleep leaving their important items all
over the place and things unlocked, as if they are in their livingroom?
And what kind of people commit this idiocy, and then spend all night
and the next day calling "mayday", and thinking it is something the
local police can, or even ought to try, to investigate & solve?  But
worst of all, what kind of people go further and propagate all this
stupidity and ignorance all over the world?

Yep, it sure is getting dangerous - the increasing danger of idiots
with crusing boats, that is...
prodigal1 - 22 Jun 2005 22:23 GMT
<snippage>
you sound like an angry person
time to go sailing
or perhaps you have a gun or three that need cleaning?
lbrty4us@aol.com - 22 Jun 2005 22:40 GMT
> <snippage>
> you sound like an angry person
> time to go sailing
> or perhaps you have a gun or three that need cleaning?

Your inference is amiss, I am a happy and contented person.  I simply
do not suffer fools who blame others for their own behavior easily, and
I feel such are a detriment to the sailing world and ultimately to
those of us who sail in prudence and peace.
prodigal1 - 23 Jun 2005 04:18 GMT
> Your inference is amiss, I am a happy and contented person.  I simply
> do not suffer fools who blame others for their own behavior easily, and
> I feel such are a detriment to the sailing world and ultimately to
> those of us who sail in prudence and peace.

then I stand corrected
Peter Hendra - 28 Jun 2005 01:50 GMT
>> Your inference is amiss, I am a happy and contented person.  I simply
>> do not suffer fools who blame others for their own behavior easily, and
>> I feel such are a detriment to the sailing world and ultimately to
>> those of us who sail in prudence and peace.
>
>then I stand corrected

Amazing.......................
And, in the meantime, the people on the yacht in Vevezuela whose misfortune to
be attacked and with no homeschoolers or other children aboard started this
thread, have supposedly not heard any more from the police.

Good discussion though.

FWIW,
Our two children (now 29 and 30) who completed their high school years on the NZ
government correspondence system seem to be doing OK. Our daughter has a good
job in IT, has just bought her second house in Sydney Aus and has just gotten
engaged - unfortunately or otherwise toan Englishman (could have been worse -
could have been from the US). The reason why we sent our 13 year old back to
school was for socialisation reasons, not academic after 1 week, the school put
him up a grade - not at our behest either. You can homeschool your kids - we
took him off correspondence as we considered it too unchallenging and rather
boring/tedious.

Also FWIW - I once saw a gathering of homeschoolers on Boston Common. I was
interested to note that many said that they homeschooled their children for
religious reasons whereas in New Zealand and Australia it is generally because
we believe we can better educate our kids.
Peter
Larry W4CSC - 28 Jun 2005 02:28 GMT
> Also FWIW - I once saw a gathering of homeschoolers on Boston Common.
> I was interested to note that many said that they homeschooled their
> children for religious reasons whereas in New Zealand and Australia it
> is generally because we believe we can better educate our kids.
> Peter

Not long ago the local Weather Bureaucrats had the NOAA Hurricane Hunter
aircraft come to Charleston for show and tell.  A bunch of us hams went out
and stood in the pouring rain all day to help with crowd control and
communications because they bussed school kids in from all over eastern SC
and Savannah schools to take the tours.  About 800 kids showed up.

In the pouring down rain, it WAS noteworthy that less than 5% of the kids
from the awful SC public schools had any raingear at all, while 90% of the
homeschooler group that came in later were all dressed out in their
slickers, boots, useless umbrellas in the 30 knot winds blowing the rain
and umbrellas all over.  In a practical sense, the homeschoolers were much
better prepared....and much more interested in the meteorologist's
presentation (given over my stepvan's DJ sound system because they didn't
have one).

Homeschoolers - 90
Public Schoolers - 5

(c;

PS - The navigator and I were talking about his comm problems inside the
storm, so I got a little more detailed tour than the kids did...(c;
Yes, they DO have HF SSB on the plane and yes, I did make 4 ham contacts on
20 meters from a hurricane hunter aircraft...(c;

DE W4CSC/Aeronautical Mobile

Plane needs more antenna.....(sigh)

Signature

Larry

You know you've had a rough night when you wake up and you're outlined in
chalk.

WaIIy - 28 Jun 2005 05:02 GMT
>> Also FWIW - I once saw a gathering of homeschoolers on Boston Common.
>> I was interested to note that many said that they homeschooled their
>> children for religious reasons whereas in New Zealand and Australia it
>> is generally because we believe we can better educate our kids.
>> Peter

I'm glad you're not a judge drawing conclusions on such lame "evidence".
Peter Hendra - 28 Jun 2005 08:02 GMT
>>> Also FWIW - I once saw a gathering of homeschoolers on Boston Common.
>>> I was interested to note that many said that they homeschooled their
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>I'm glad you're not a judge drawing conclusions on such lame "evidence".

Pray forgive me my dear sir.

I fail to see where I drew any conclusions from "such lame "evidence"". There
was no conclusion to be drawn nor was any suggested. If your English
comprehension is such that you have trouble with basic English useage, then I
would point out that I merely made an observation and drew no conclusion
whatsoever. With a science background and well familiar with random sampling of
populations and the maths involved I would have sampled perhaps less than 0.05
percent and thus could not. Nor did I conduct a survey with properly structured
questions. I may however have hypothesised - but neglected to do even that.
Also, I have presented no "evidence" at all as there was none excepting
statements of a few people I talked to. They were the ones who told me that most
of the several hundred people present were Christians and homeschooling for
religious reasons.

As I said, I merely made an observation.

Forgive me all for this forthcoming sin but I suppose that you have similar
problems to shrub and his friends - Blair and Deputy Sherrif Howard in their
concept of what constitutes "evidence" - eg. "weapons of mass destruction"

Really, is there any need to make negative comments such as this?
WaIIy - 29 Jun 2005 00:20 GMT
>Forgive me all for this forthcoming sin but I suppose that you have similar
>problems to shrub and his friends - Blair and Deputy Sherrif Howard in their
>concept of what constitutes "evidence" - eg. "weapons of mass destruction"
>
>Really, is there any need to make negative comments such as this?

You asked your own question and revealed your agenda all  a few
sentences.
Peter Hendra - 29 Jun 2005 03:36 GMT
>>Forgive me all for this forthcoming sin but I suppose that you have similar
>>problems to shrub and his friends - Blair and Deputy Sherrif Howard in their
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>You asked your own question and revealed your agenda all  a few
>sentences.

Actually, I have no agenda. I merely object to the bullshit that we are fed by
the media from the politicians.

When Australia invaded east Timor in a purely humanitarian gesture to "save the
poor East Timorese", we in Australia had to pay an extra "war tax". What most
people did not realise at the time was that plans had already been drawn up for
the building of a refinery at Darwin to cater for the expected oil from east
Timor of which nothing appeared in the media. One month after the troops
arrived, an agreement was signed by the new government. For years Australia had
kept its hands off the former Portugese colony. When the Indonesians invaded,
when 5 Australian journalists were killed by the military, when thousands of
people were slaughtered etc, etc. not a word of protest was heard. as soon as
there was evidence of oil, they sent in the troops. Why tax us and not the oil
companies.

Perhaps you should bear in mind that your president is defacto, also ours yet we
cannot vote in the American presidential elections. What he and his
administration does influences us in the rest of the world to a very large
degree - eg Middle East foreign policy, carbon emissions etc . I cannot
understand why, when anyone makes any comment that may be remotely misconstrued
as a criticism of US foreign policy, paranoia such as yours leaps to the fore. I
have heard Rumsfield stating on CNN that yes, the US gave Sadam the Weapons of
mass destruction and have read in US magazines that they also gave them the
chemiocal weapons to fight Iran (Sadam was once considered a good US ally), yet
we are still; fed bullshit. I have met few anywhere, even in the Middle east who
wished him to stay in power. Why not admit to the lies and admit that it was all
for oil? Remember, Australia also invaded alongside the US and Britain. I am an
Australian as well as a New Zealand citizen and feel that I am permitted to
criticise my own government.

For the record, I am not anti-American, quite the contrary. I am looking forward
to sailing along your eastern coastline next year. Perhaps you should wear a hat
when out in the sun so as not to redden your neck.
WaIIy - 29 Jun 2005 04:55 GMT
>Why not admit to the lies and admit that it was all
>for oil? Remember, Australia also invaded alongside the US and Britain. I am an
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>to sailing along your eastern coastline next year. Perhaps you should wear a hat
>when out in the sun so as not to redden your neck.

Uhhhh, I guess we're doing really well stealing all that Iraqi oil now,
aren't we?

Your last paragraph contradicts itself and shows how disingenuous you
are.

sitting here shaking my head
Peter Wiley - 30 Jun 2005 10:56 GMT
> >>Forgive me all for this forthcoming sin but I suppose that you have similar
> >>problems to shrub and his friends - Blair and Deputy Sherrif Howard in their
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> there was evidence of oil, they sent in the troops. Why tax us and not the oil
> companies.

Just because *you* and your equally ignorant associates didn't know
that there was oil there isn't proof that nobody else knew. It's been a
well known fact for decades.

The *FACT* is, we're likely to pay East Timor FAR, FAR, FAR more and
maybe have to renegotiate the seabed boundary IN THEIR FAVOUR now
they're independent. That boundary was a done deal while Indonesia had
possession/control. Australia, as a nation, was a lot better off
WITHOUT an independent, poor, problematic and likely failed state off
our NW boundary, causing aggravation with Indonesia. Nevertheless, they
did want independence and we did support them in their desires, AGAINST
OUR OWN NATIONAL INTEREST.

God, I wish people like you would learn to read something other than
Green Left Weekly. Get a brain, not everything is about oil. In this
case, it's mainly natural gas anyway, and we have vast reserves on the
NW Shelf already.

PDW
lbrty4us@aol.com - 28 Jun 2005 04:50 GMT
> Also FWIW - I once saw a gathering of homeschoolers on Boston Common. I was
> interested to note that many said that they homeschooled their children for
> religious reasons whereas in New Zealand and Australia it is generally because
> we believe we can better educate our kids.

Some homeschool to protect their children from being dehumanbized by
the behaviorism which drives the globalist workforce training system
wrongly called "education."
Larry W4CSC - 28 Jun 2005 22:35 GMT
> globalist workforce training system
> wrongly called "education."

I disagree.  If public education were the "globalist workforce training
system" you say, public education would actually be teaching these kids to
DO something.  It's not.  It teaches them to become liberal arts college
students, a dead-end way to nowhere.  The "gwts" would be teaching them
plumbing, electrical repair, carpentry, how to be a cashier and handle
money.  Test my theory.  Ask 10 high school seniors to make change for a
$7.43 restaurant bill out of a $20 bill.  GWTS students would do this very
easy...as part of the cashier apprenticeship program.  High school seniors
on their way to a liberal arts education have no idea how to make change or
fix a kitchen faucet that leaks.  Try that too...()c;

The liberal arts students are easy to spot at McDonald's.  Just turn off
the computers and open the cash drawers to see how many can make
change....(c;

Signature

Larry

You know you've had a rough night when you wake up and you're outlined in
chalk.

WaIIy - 29 Jun 2005 00:21 GMT
>> globalist workforce training system
>> wrongly called "education."
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>the computers and open the cash drawers to see how many can make
>change....(c;

Don't forget the bank tellers.
HarryKrause - 29 Jun 2005 02:06 GMT
>>globalist workforce training system
>>wrongly called "education."
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> the computers and open the cash drawers to see how many can make
> change....(c;

All this from a high school dropout?

Doubtful you even know what "liberal arts" studies entail.

There's nothing wrong with trade school training, but some seek higher
education in order to expand their minds and learn how to think at
higher levels.

Signature

If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

Jere Lull - 29 Jun 2005 06:59 GMT
> There's nothing wrong with trade school training, but some seek higher
> education in order to expand their minds and learn how to think at
> higher levels.

While I may not actually disagree with you --I've lost track of this
thread-- I had to respond to this.

Higher education rarely leads to learning how to think at higher levels.
At best, it gives a little more information for the student to apply,
and possibly an alternate viewpoint in its application. Since few profs
can think at higher levels, they are themselves hobbled. (if they could
do it, they'd get paid far more doing it.)

And I'm not slamming you in particular. I just happen to be a computer
jock from way back who thinks SO differently that few of my co-workers
can follow my logic on a solution without a few hours' explanation.
(Those that can are truly scary individuals ;-)

My profs (as I try to get the pigskin) are hopeless, since they hardly
understand what they're presenting, much less the basic concepts or the
philosophy.

In my experience, there are a few educators out there that, along with
the material, teach those who are capable and ready how to think. I ran
into two: 5th and 11th grade. No one even close since.

Bringing it back to sailing, there are few who can teach others how to
sail. Most can merely point to the various elements of sailing and
sketch out how they're supposed to work together. It's up to the student
to do the heavy lifting. The good thing is that most sailing instructors
can at least do that adequately.

Signature

Jere Lull
Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD)
Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html
Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/

Vito - 29 Jun 2005 14:27 GMT
> I disagree.  If public education were the "globalist workforce training
> system" you say, public education would actually be teaching these kids to
> DO something.  It's not.  It teaches them to become liberal arts college
> students, a dead-end way to nowhere.

Bwahahahaha! You're absolutely right. As one "educator" quipped " We go to
elementary school to get into High school, then high school to get into
college, a bachlor degree to get a masters, a masters to get a doctorate and
a doctorate so we can teach - a closed circuit."
Stephen Trapani - 29 Jun 2005 15:42 GMT
>>I disagree.  If public education were the "globalist workforce training
>>system" you say, public education would actually be teaching these kids to
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> college, a bachlor degree to get a masters, a masters to get a doctorate and
> a doctorate so we can teach - a closed circuit."

You left out: "Even employers are fooled into thinking we are learning
something useful by requiring us to waste all this time and hiring us
off of test scores that show how good we were at wasting it!"

Signature

Stephen

-------

For any proposition there is always some sufficiently narrow
interpretation of its terms, such that it turns out true, and
some sufficiently wide interpretation such that it turns out
false...concept stretching will refute *any* statement, and will
leave no true statement whatsoever.
  -- Imre Lakatos

Larry W4CSC - 30 Jun 2005 02:20 GMT
> You left out: "Even employers are fooled into thinking we are learning
> something useful by requiring us to waste all this time and hiring us
> off of test scores that show how good we were at wasting it!"

It is why the Japanese, Chinese and Koreans are all whippin' our a.ses.  A
kid has to WORK HARD to get into a Japanese high school.  It isn't handed
him on a platter, he works for it, so he appreciates what it does for him
in their culture.  We, on the other hand, treat all kids the same, to our
detriment.  We are NOT all the same, neither are our children.  How stupid
it is to treat them so.  The really smart ones are bored to tears.  The
ones in the middle who are motivated work hard.  The lesser of them flunk,
over and over and noone cares.  We blame them for flunking.  We beat them
up.  However, if our liberal arts education system were run by INTELLEGENT
people, instead of those who can't put batteries in a flashlight (it's
true, I used to teach electronics and knew many who couldn't), we would try
to recognize HOW the children are different, how their wants are in
different directions, and stop trying to shove them into the liberal arts
holes in the pegboard.  A kid who is dying to fix complex automobile
engines....or (on topic) a marine diesel...has no opportunity until
released from his 12-year prison sentence to acquire his skills.  Very few
schools have apprenticeship programs like the young boy taken under the
wings at Orange County Choppers on American Chopper is doing.  We closed up
the vocational schools teaching children real skills because we don't want
them TOO INDEPENDENT or TOO SKILLED that our corporations can't turn them
into cheap slave labor (or labour if you like).

So, the geniuses running Asian schools in these three countries simply take
over the world, quietly, unendingly....while the Americans can't find a
skilled boat mechanic, plumber, brick layer, carpenter, electrician,
outboard motor mechanic, electronic technician, etc....the skilled labor
that keeps the world pumping....

Signature

Larry

You know you've had a rough night when you wake up and you're outlined in
chalk.

Vito - 30 Jun 2005 14:59 GMT
> You left out: "Even employers are fooled into thinking we are learning
> something useful by requiring us to waste all this time and hiring us
> off of test scores that show how good we were at wasting it!"

Not necessarily.  If I have an applicant with a "B" average in math thru
trig., chemestry and physics, and a foreign language (whether from a public
or private school or a *recognized* home study program) I can pretty much
depend on his/her having some knowledge of those subjects - enough
confidence that I'd bring them for interviews.  OTOH, if a application shows
no math, science or languages in high school and "satisfactory" for grades
in dumbell English, study hall and gym - or worse if it says "home schooled"
with no backup credentials whatsoever I'd prolly keep looking.

Unfortunately, as Larry says, nobody has "shop" classes any more - classes
that teach kids to be apprentice carpenters, electricians or machinists.  I
don't think this is as much politically motivated as it is fear of
liability. Many (most?) 14-18 year olds are too immature to trust with a
hammer let alone run machine tools or work with electricity.  Remember,
Daniel Boone and Jesse Chisohm were doing their things by age 12 - how many
modern teens would you trust to carry a gun?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.