Jack Erbes <jackerbes@roadrunner.com> wrote in news:4850ff8f$0$7692
$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
> I'm thinking that shortening the cable could upset a resonant circuit
> and that is not a good thing, right?
I sure hope they're not trying to tune an audio line with 50' of coax....
I've never seen any ill effects of shortening the cable IF you shield the
interconnection point so it doesn't tear up the HF receiver...(c;
> That may be bad advice Larry.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Jack
Not really relevant in Depth Sounder Transducer design. Most Sounders
at using LOWER Frequencies than 500 Khz, and the difference in cable
length would only be a very small fraction of a Wavelength, at that
frequency.
The REAL Reason for that Statement, is to keep uneducated folks from
messing up the splice, and then asking the OEM, to replace it for Free,
because it doesn't work anymore.
I have spiced thousands of Transducer Cables, over the years, rather
than running a new one down from the Bridge, when replacing a blown
Transducer. It is a LOT cheaper than Hiring a Carpenter, Electrician,
and Shipfitter, just to pull all the Paneling, Raceway covers, etc, to
run a new Transducer Cable. You splice your RF Cables all the time,
Transducer Cables are exactly the same idea, except usually they are
Differential Loads, (Two wires and Ground/Shield) and significantly
lower in frequency. Attenuation in the splice is linearly related to
Frequency, and at sub 500 Khz is NOT a significant loss. SWR is also
not significant unless you cable is a couple of hundred Meters Long.
It is always nice to give the Output Resonant Circuit a Tweak, after
messing with the Transducer, Cable, etc, and peak it up using an
O-Scope across the Transducer Output of the Sounder. That ensures
that your matched to the Transducer Load, and you can also tweak
the first Receiver Resonator for Maximum Return signal at the same time.
Usually it makes less than 1 or 2 DB difference.

Signature
Bruce in alaska
add <path> after <fast> to reply
Jack Erbes - 12 Jun 2008 21:16 GMT
>> That may be bad advice Larry.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Not really relevant in Depth Sounder Transducer design....<snip>
Okay, I guess I just believe too much of what I read in the install
manuals.
But if these bastards that are breaking into homes to rip all the copper
out and sell it for scrap ever get wind of how much wire is coiled up in
the bilges of boats, there is going to be some real trouble...
Jack
Bruce in alaska - 13 Jun 2008 20:55 GMT
> Okay, I guess I just believe too much of what I read in the install
> manuals.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Jack
Only those guys are so stupid, they would try and get the Transducer,
while they are there, open a hole in the hull, and die trying to
get out of the bilge, before the vessel SANK.....

Signature
Bruce in alaska
add <path> after <fast> to reply
Larry - 02 Jul 2008 07:12 GMT
Bruce in alaska <fast@btpost.net> wrote in news:fast-CAEC19.11221012062008
@netnews.worldnet.att.net:
> Not really relevant in Depth Sounder Transducer design. Most Sounders
> at using LOWER Frequencies than 500 Khz, and the difference in cable
> length would only be a very small fraction of a Wavelength, at that
> frequency.
> T
I think the manufacturers are not recommending it because of the molded
plugs and tech support headaches created by some non-technical boaters
cutting the wires then screwing up putting the shortened wires back
together without shorting the cable and blowing the transmitters.
I can see their point.....(c;
It's more a human problem than anything technical....