Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsBoatsPaddle BoatsSailingCruisingBuildingElectronics
Related Topics
CarsMotorcyclesMore Topics ...

Boat Forum / Electronics / July 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Any USED AIS Class A Transponders?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Geoff Schultz - 11 Jun 2009 11:34 GMT
Has anyone seen any used AIS class A transponders for sale?  I do enough
off-shore sailing to want a class A instead of a class B.

-- Geoff
www.GeoffSchultz.org
John Navas - 11 Jun 2009 16:43 GMT
>Has anyone seen any used AIS class A transponders for sale?  I do enough
>off-shore sailing to want a class A instead of a class B.

Class A is probably going to cost you at least $3,000
<http://store.milltechmarine.com/acrglaistr.html>,
versus less than half of that for Class B:
<http://www.wmjmarine.com/ait250.html>
<http://www.consumersmarine.com/modperl/product/details.cgi?r=view&i=980030>
Why do you think it's worth the additional cost?

Signature

Best regards,
John Navas, publisher of Navas' Sailing & Racing in
the San Francisco Bay Area  <http://sail.navas.us/>

Geoff Schultz - 11 Jun 2009 17:34 GMT
>>Has anyone seen any used AIS class A transponders for sale?  I do
>>enough off-shore sailing to want a class A instead of a class B.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> <http://www.consumersmarine.com/modperl/product/details.cgi?r=view&i=98
> 0030> Why do you think it's worth the additional cost?

Up until today I was one of those under the false impression that AIS
displays would be able to filter out class B information.  According to
something that I just read on Panbo.com, this impression is common, but
false. The last thing that I wanted to do was to be doing an off-shore
passage and have my information filtered by an approaching ship.

Here's a link to the article:

http://www.panbo.com/archives/2009/04/ais_solas-
style_class_b_is_not_ignorable.html#more

I am also a bit concerned about ships not upgrading their software to
include class B messages.  I know that until I recently upgraded my
RayMarine software, that it didn't understand class B messages.

However, after reading the article on Panbo, I feel much better about class
B and will probably get a class B.  

-- Geoff
www.GeoffSchultz.org
Michael Porter - 12 Jun 2009 12:19 GMT
>>>Has anyone seen any used AIS class A transponders for sale?  I do
>>>enough off-shore sailing to want a class A instead of a class B.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>-- Geoff
>www.GeoffSchultz.org

I have a class B unit (ACR) and the big guys see me.  Of course I see
them from farther away, but that is an antenna height issue and would
be true of class  A also.

Michael Porter
Michael Porter Marine Design
mporter at mp-marine dot com
www.mp-marine.com
377 - 12 Jun 2009 23:42 GMT
> Has anyone seen any used AIS class A transponders for sale?  I do enough
> off-shore sailing to want a class A instead of a class B.
>
> -- Geoffwww.GeoffSchultz.org

I bought a brand new ACR/Nauticast  class A AIS  transponder on ebay
for $1100. It was sold by a seller in Singapore who lists high end
commercial marine gear from time to time. He had a high reserve
($1800?) in the first auction and nobody bid high enough. I made him
the $1100 offer and he eventually took it. Shipping was expensive,
about $75.

http://www.acrelectronics.com/globalwatch2/globalwatch2.html

At $1100 it was not cheap but  still way lower than list price. It
lacked cables and GPS antenna, but I found a 5 VDC amplified GPS
antenna on eBay for $10 that was plug and play (SMA connector). I saw
a nearly new Furuno class A AIS go for about $900 on ebay a while
back.

My ACR AIS Xponder runs on 24 VDC and my boat is 12 VDC, but I can
find a bunch of easy ways to convert 12 to 24, including a cheap
inverter and AC supply. I am sure there is a linear regulator insdie
that probably knocks down 24 to 12 VDC, but I dont want to modify
anything in case I need factory service.

My boat is a commercial fishing boat but small enough that AIS is not
mandatory. I sometimes fish in foggy crowded waters off San Francisco
and wanted the best AIS I could afford. The more frequent
transmissions of class A and the large number of message options
appealed to me. I also wanted a self contained unit that didnt need a
laptop or anything else.

Mark
Geoff Schultz - 13 Jun 2009 03:04 GMT
377 <boeing377@gmail.com> wrote in news:e862609d-7bee-4afa-be3c-
6c96c9385bbe@c20g2000prh.googlegroups.com:

>> Has anyone seen any used AIS class A transponders for sale?  I do enoug
> h
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Mark

I've been watching for used AIS transponders on Ebay for a while and
haven't seen any.  That's why I asked here.  I agree with your reasoning
for wanting one.  I just ordered a Comar CSB-200 class B transponder
based upon my research.  I'm also considering an active radar reflector.

-- Geoff
www.GeoffSchultz.org
John Navas - 13 Jun 2009 03:10 GMT
>I'm also considering an active radar reflector.

Choose with care, because some do more harm than good.

Signature

Best regards,
John Navas, publisher of Navas' Sailing & Racing in
the San Francisco Bay Area  <http://sail.navas.us/>

Geoff Schultz - 13 Jun 2009 18:18 GMT
>>I'm also considering an active radar reflector.
>
> Choose with care, because some do more harm than good.

I've been looking at the See-Me active radar reflector.  Any comments on it
would be appreciated.

-- Geoff
www.GeoffSchultz.org
John Navas - 14 Jun 2009 15:26 GMT
>>>I'm also considering an active radar reflector.
>>
>> Choose with care, because some do more harm than good.
>
>I've been looking at the See-Me active radar reflector.  Any comments on it
>would be appreciated.

Good -- exceeds ISO 8729.

Signature

Best regards,
John Navas, publisher of Navas' Sailing & Racing in
the San Francisco Bay Area  <http://sail.navas.us/>

Gordon - 14 Jun 2009 16:14 GMT
> 377 <boeing377@gmail.com> wrote in news:e862609d-7bee-4afa-be3c-
> 6c96c9385bbe@c20g2000prh.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> -- Geoff
> www.GeoffSchultz.org

  Panbo discussion
http://www.panbo.com/archives/2007/05/radar_reflectors_do_they_really_work.html
 G
Gordon - 14 Jun 2009 17:16 GMT
> 377 <boeing377@gmail.com> wrote in news:e862609d-7bee-4afa-be3c-
> 6c96c9385bbe@c20g2000prh.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> -- Geoff
> www.GeoffSchultz.org

  Seeing as how the ais xponder has to be programmed with your ships
info when you buy it, it wouldn't seem you will find any used ones about
or if you did, how would you get it reprogrammed?.
 G
Steve Lusardi - 27 Jun 2009 18:05 GMT
Geof,
I bought a 1 year old Class A Simrad unit used as a demo unit for marine
shows on eBay for $1300. Please note, there are substantial differences
between Class A and Class B. One of which is the Class A has its own
internal GPS among many others.
Steve

> Has anyone seen any used AIS class A transponders for sale?  I do enough
> off-shore sailing to want a class A instead of a class B.
>
> -- Geoff
> www.GeoffSchultz.org
Larry - 27 Jun 2009 19:17 GMT
"Steve Lusardi" <stevenospam@lusardi.de> wrote in news:h25jht$484$01$1
@news.t-online.com:

> Geof,
> I bought a 1 year old Class A Simrad unit used as a demo unit for marine
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> -- Geoff
>> www.GeoffSchultz.org 

Don't you have to have a Class A ship to use that?  I didn't think pleasure
boats were supposed to be on Class A's turf.....or have the GMDSS
Operator's License from the FCC to operate it.

Bruce in Alaska?  Which license does he need ship and operator for Class
A??

Signature

-----
Larry

If a man goes way out into the woods all alone and says something,
is it still wrong, even though no woman hears him?

Michael Porter - 27 Jun 2009 22:12 GMT
>Don't you have to have a Class A ship to use that?  I didn't think pleasure
>boats were supposed to be on Class A's turf.....or have the GMDSS
>Operator's License from the FCC to operate it.
>
>Bruce in Alaska?  Which license does he need ship and operator for Class
>A??

In the Carib. I saw several pleasure boats (admittedly mostly bigger
than us) with class A units.  Don't know about the licensing, but it's
just another VHF radio.

Michael Porter

Michael Porter Marine Design
mporter at mp-marine dot com
www.mp-marine.com
Larry - 28 Jun 2009 03:04 GMT
> Don't know about the licensing, but it's
> just another VHF radio.

Well, yes and no, it's not......

For US boats, the FCC says:

http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?
job=licensing&id=ship_stations

"Who Needs a Ship Station License
You do not need a license to operate a marine VHF radio, radar, or
EPIRBs aboard voluntary ships operating domestically. The term
"voluntary ships" refers to ships that are not required by law to carry
a radio. Generally, this term applies to recreation or pleasure craft.
The term "voluntary ships" does not apply to the following:

  1. Cargo ships over 300 gross tons navigating in the open sea;
  2. Ships certified by the U.S. Coast Guard to carry more than 6
passengers for hire in the open sea or tidewaters of the U.S.;
  3. Power driven ships over 20 meters in length on navigable
waterways;
  4. Ships of more than 100 gross tons certified by the U.S. Coast
Guard to carry at least one passenger on navigable waterways;
  5. Tow boats of more than 7.8 meters in length on navigable
waterways; and,
  6. Uninspected commercial fishing industry vessels required to carry
a VHF radio.
  7. Ships required to carry an Automatic Identification System (AIS)
transceiver by the U.S. Coast Guard regulations enacted pursuant to the
Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2000."

Either class of AIS transponder is NOT a "marine VHF radio", though it
operates on two their old marine operator channels.

Of course, in true bureaucratic form, FCC has a muddled legalese of
conflicting rules and regs only a Philadelphia lawyer can read:

"The GMDSS regulations are contained in 47 C.F.R. Part 80. Most of the
GMDSS regulations are in Subpart W of Part 80, but Subpart W also cross-
references certain other FCC rules, as follows (the cross-referencing
Subpart W is listed parenthetically after the cross-referenced rule):
13.2 (80.1073(a)), 13.21 (80.1073(a)), 80.334 (80.1114), 80.335
(80.1114), 80.836 (80.1065(b)(5)(iii)), 80.933 (80.1065(b)(5)(iii))."

Does 80.1065(b)(5)(iii) supercede 80.933 or is it separate in parens??
Who the hell set sails and read this?.....almost noone.

Look closely at your copy of:
Report and Order, PR Docket No. 90-480, FCC 92-19, 7 FCC Rcd 951 (1992)
to see some changes to GMDSS rules.

==================================================================

On a separate issue, I don't understand this:

http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=operations_2
&id=ship_stations

"What are the requirements regarding communications personnel aboard
GMDSS ships?
The FCC requires two licensed radio operators to be aboard all GMDSS
certified ships, one of whom must be available to act as a dedicated
radio operator during a distress situation. The radio operators must be
holders of a GMDSS Radio Operator's License. The GMDSS radio operator is
an individual licensed to handle radio communications aboard ships in
compliance with the GMDSS regulations, including basic equipment and
antenna adjustments. The GMDSS radio operator need not be a radio
officer.
Another IMO Convention requires all masters and mates to hold the GMDSS
Radio Operator's License and attend a two week training course and
demonstrate competency with operation of the GMDSS equipment. These
requirements would also carry to any person employed specifically to act
as a dedicated radio operator if the ship elected to carry such a
position."

DSC, the selective calling and distress messaging part of your
unlicensed VHF radio they told you didn't require a license, is PART OF
GMDSS!  So, requires TWO licensed radio operators holding GMDSS Radio
Operator's Licenses, one of which must be free to operate the GMDSS
equipment during emergencies.  All masters and mates must hold GMDSS
Radio Operator's Licenses and attend a two week training course and
demonstrate competency with operation of the GMDSS Equipment.

The question has never been adequately answered......What about using
the DSC part of GMDSS on a sailboat that has no license at all??.....

It's a bureaucratic nightmare........

Then there's Maritel's money grab:

http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3669A1.doc

"Domestic vessels would be charged an initial registration fee of $300
(for mandatory carriage vessels) or $375 (for non-mandatory carriage
vessels), with an annual renewal fee of $75.  Foreign vessels subject to
the SOLAS Convention would be charged a $75 annual fee.  Shore stations
would be charged an initial fee of $4,500 per site for processing and RF
engineering study, and a $750 annual renewal fee thereafter."

How much money you got for AIS transponders?  That was in 2003!  It's
STILL on the FCC's website!

You'll need to keep checking:

http://www.hallikainen.org/FCC/FccRules/CiteFind/080373.htm

as they can't seem to make up their minds even which of Maritel's
precious coast station channels they're going to use for AIS.  Early AIS
equipment, like you may have purchased use, might not operate on the
newer channels Maritel and the FCC have been haggling over to maximize
profits....??

As you can see, the FCC websites are a hodge-podge of GMDSS intersperced
with snippets about AIS.  The Coast Guard is more sure of itself, even
though it hasn't a clue, most of the time.  At least there's some less
conflicting information:
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/enav/ais/default.htm

I think you need to first see if that box you bought is "AIS Certified"
by both FCC and USCG:
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/enav/ais/AIS_Certification.htm
There's a ton of pointers, of course, to a hodge podge of rules and
regulations.  So, we go here:
http://cgmix.uscg.mil/Equipment/EquipmentSearch.aspx
Click the box that leads to certifications up to include toilet paper
and pick:
Automatic Identification System (AIS)- 165.155
from the pick list.
THERE YA GO!  THERE'S ONLY 22 DIFFERENT UNITS CERTIFIED BY USCG!
Is one of these YOURS?  If not....dump it...you can't use it.

Signature

-----
Larry

If a man goes way out into the woods all alone and says something,
is it still wrong, even though no woman hears him?

Steve Lusardi - 29 Jun 2009 23:12 GMT
Larry,
This database is at 4 least years outdated. The Simrad model that has the
approval has been out of production for at least 4 years. My AIS , bought in
the US, is at least 2 generations newer. Manufactured in 2007.
Steve

>> Don't know about the licensing, but it's
>> just another VHF radio.
[quoted text clipped - 127 lines]
> THERE YA GO!  THERE'S ONLY 22 DIFFERENT UNITS CERTIFIED BY USCG!
> Is one of these YOURS?  If not....dump it...you can't use it.
Larry - 30 Jun 2009 06:06 GMT
> Larry,
> This database is at 4 least years outdated. The Simrad model that has
> the approval has been out of production for at least 4 years. My AIS ,
> bought in the US, is at least 2 generations newer. Manufactured in
> 2007. Steve

Therein lies the big legal problem.  The government bureaucrats are so far
behind the technology THEY are still posting 4-year-old data as VALID.  
Panbo's website is much better up to date for millions less dollars.

I don't understand why CG and FCC can't get their act together on marine
comms/AIS/GMDSS.  It all seems as if they are just baffled by anything but
the basic narrow-band FM transceivers.  The local staff just looks
dumbfounded if you ask any of them, here.

Signature

-----
Larry

If a man goes way out into the woods all alone and says something,
is it still wrong, even though no woman hears him?

Bruce in alaska - 30 Jun 2009 21:49 GMT
> > Larry,
> > This database is at 4 least years outdated. The Simrad model that has
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> the basic narrow-band FM transceivers.  The local staff just looks
> dumbfounded if you ask any of them, here.

Ok, Larry, I have an Inquiry in with the Maritime Rules Chief at the
FCC, but he is on vacation, till the middle of August, so I have another
Inquiry with his Stand-in, who should get back to me, in the next day or
two.... and I will get the definitive answer, for Licensing, for both
Vessel and Operator, for both classes of AIS Transponders.....

Signature

Bruce in alaska
add <path> after <fast> to reply

Larry - 02 Jul 2009 03:56 GMT
Bruce in alaska <fast@btpost.net> wrote in news:fast-
D579FD.12491530062009@unknown.usenetserver.com:

> Ok, Larry, I have an Inquiry in with the Maritime Rules Chief at the
> FCC, but he is on vacation, till the middle of August, so I have another
> Inquiry with his Stand-in, who should get back to me, in the next day or
> two.... and I will get the definitive answer, for Licensing, for both
> Vessel and Operator, for both classes of AIS Transponders.....

Thank you, Bruce.  The boaters are just too casual with radio operation,
I'm afraid.  It's become even more of a problem when we "went CB" with
no licenses to lose.  There's no enforcement in Charleston any more,
either.  The only one who calls them out is the CG watch, whom they
mostly ignore.

Marina operations go on no matter whos boat is sinking or whos person is
lost and being searched for.  The operators in the marinas, here, are
college kids working in the office with no radio experience, licenses,
operating procedures, etc.  We did get them to stop saying "10-4" on the
air, though.  Their bosses do make them say the station callsigns.  If
someone's calling for help, it's not the marina's fault so the distress
call goes ignored because its not from the diesel or gas docks.  All
marinas need to be told to take down the towers and go to 1 watt.  
Channel 68 wasn't meant for long range marina communications.  Some
marinas have towers 70' high running 25 watts!

Some kids last summer got me mad.  Mom and Daddy had left them on the
boat to go shopping or something.  They started harrassing people on Ch
16 trying to make calls.  The signal was quite strong on my walkie so I
took the antenna off it and started walking the docks, waiting,
listening, walking some more.  I had my earphone plugged in so noone
could hear it on the dock.  As I walked by this boat from New Jersey, a
nice trawler on the face dock, I heard the kid calling someone out
through the open hatch.  I flipped open my cellphone and called CG's
watch giving him the boat name and slip number.  He said he had a rib
looking for them, too, and went off to military channels to tell them I
found 'em.  About 10 minutes later, a big CG rib came up to the dock,
its sailors all looking like the swat team.  They boarded the trawler
and I heard the kids scream.  Problem solved.  The dockhands said Daddy
got another surprise when he got home.  Not sure if some little a.ses 
got the tanning they deserved, probably not....

I bet Daddy secured that radio before he left the boat after that
fine.....

Signature

-----
Larry

If a man goes way out into the woods all alone and says something,
is it still wrong, even though no woman hears him?

Bruce in alaska - 03 Jul 2009 05:44 GMT
> > > Larry,
> > > This database is at 4 least years outdated. The Simrad model that has
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> two.... and I will get the definitive answer, for Licensing, for both
> Vessel and Operator, for both classes of AIS Transponders.....

Followup.... well the guy called "Me" back, Twice now, but I was out of
the cabin both times, so we are exchanging Phone Messages.... I did learn
that "AIS is licensed to the vessel, on it's "Radio License", as
"Transponder", and therefor can NOT be fitted on a vessel that does NOT
have a valid Ship Station License". So if you want to have AIS, you MUST
license your vessel, and receive a Ship Station License.... No Blanket
Licensing allowed... I suspect, but have yet to get a firm conformation,
that AIS, as a Transponder, doesn't REQUIRE an Operators Permit or
License, as once it is programmed with the vessels IDent, Callsign, Etc,
it then just repeats that information, in a FIXED and Defined format,
therefore wouldn't need Operator Intervention, and therefor doesn't
require a Licensed Operator, like an MF/HF Radio would.

Another note, Here, it is NOT DSC, that REQUIRES a GMDSS Operators
License, It is the operation of an MF/HF Transmitter, that Requires an
Operators permit of some kind. The Class of that License or Permit will
be different for each type of vessel. Where Passenger Ships in the
telegraph days REQUIRED a 1st Class Radiotelegraph License to be Chief
Radio Operator, but a Cargo Vessel of the same size only REQUIRED a 2nd
Class Radiotelegraph License, and a smaller (300 - 1600 Ton) vessel only
REQUIRED a Marine RadioTelephone License, as they had NO Telegraph
Radio's fitted, and smaller than that (under 300 Tons) you just needed
your Lifetime Restricted RadioTelephone Permit.... I believe that the
Commission is still of the same opinion, that VHF/Radar use on vessels
that NEVER leave US Waters, can be exempted from Licensing, but if a
vessel leaves US Waters, it MUST comply with International Conventions
that REQUIRE a Ship Station License issued by the Country of FLAG. If
the Radio Station is likely to have transmitters that can effect, and
communicate with International Communications, it is REQUIRED by those
same Conventions, to be operated by a Licensed Operator who has the
appropriate Class of License, for that vessel, as determined by the
Country of Flag.

It is more about distance of communications, and effectiveness of any
unintentional interference that a Station operated by a non-Licensed
Operator could cause, and less about the information being conveyed.

Bruce in alaska

Signature

Bruce in alaska
add <path> after <fast> to reply

Steve Lusardi - 04 Jul 2009 06:28 GMT
Thanks for your effort Bruce. It is good information.
Steve

>> > > Larry,
>> > > This database is at 4 least years outdated. The Simrad model that has
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
> Bruce in alaska
Larry - 05 Jul 2009 00:59 GMT
> Followup.... well the guy called "Me" back, Twice now, but I was out
> of the cabin both times, so we are exchanging Phone Messages.... I did
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> therefor doesn't require a Licensed Operator, like an MF/HF Radio
> would.

But, each time you sail, the operator must program into AIS the
destination, ETA, current draft, etc, that does change on each leg of a
voyage.  That would, I'm guessing, require a GMDSS Operator's License to
program, which is about half the AIS message format.

Well, we DID answer the pressing question that NO, casual sailboaters
will NOT just plug in an AIS to their GPS and antenna and go blindly
around transmitting on AIS to anyone who listens with no license or
training like they do VHF FM voice.  It's not a plug n play device.

> Another note, Here, it is NOT DSC, that REQUIRES a GMDSS Operators
> License, It is the operation of an MF/HF Transmitter, that Requires an
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> operated by a Licensed Operator who has the appropriate Class of
> License, for that vessel, as determined by the Country of Flag.

In the question of AIS, unlicensed operators and boats won't be
transmitting on AIS unless they get licensed.  I can see a LOT of NALs
going out to unlicensed stations over this from this information.  It is
illegal to transmit on AIS without a "transponder-endorsed" ship
license.  That makes sense, really, as the ship's FCC callsign is one of
the message's variables.  It'll be easy to police.  FCC monitors simply
look for valid callsigns on AIS and bust anyone without them.  "Her
Orgasm" is not a valid callsign...(c;]

> It is more about distance of communications, and effectiveness of any
> unintentional interference that a Station operated by a non-Licensed
> Operator could cause, and less about the information being conveyed.
>
> Bruce in alaska

It'll be interesting to see what they say about the OPERATOR's license
required to operate both A and B AIS on there properly-licensed and
installed boats.  Boaters are in for a shock.

If you do get to talk to him, please ask my age-old question, which
license is required to transmit NON EMERGENCY DSC calls on VHF?  Is it
legal for a NON-licensed boat with unlicensed operators to operate non-
emergency DSC on VHF, which is DATA or TRANSPONDER...not voice?  Reading
Part 80:
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_00/47cfr80_00.html
80.151 is WAY behind in begin upgraded.  It only has GROL other than the
old telegraph licenses on it.  GMDSS operator licenses aren't even
mentioned!  It's crazy the way they've left it.  It makes no sense at
all.

Now, Let's discuss GMDSS Restricted Operator (RG class), less than 20
miles offshore:
http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/index.htm?job=rg
"The exam consists of questions from the following categories: general
information, VHF digital selective calling, and carriage requirement. To
pass, an examinee must correctly answer at least 38 out of 50
questions."
This is the GMDSS VHF OPERATOR's license....VHF DSC!  That's what it's
for!  No boaters I know have one....

Going further than 20 miles offshore with DSC?
http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/index.htm?job=do
Then you need a GMDSS Operator's License (DO class), which is all DSC,
HF and VHF.  This is the operator's license for DSC equipped Ship
Stations going offshore to foreign ports....like the Bahamas.

Now, let's look what it says about Restricted RADIOTELEPHONE Operator's
Permit, the one all the boaters just write off for and get to operate
Ship RADIOTELEPHONE stations:
http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/index.htm?job=rr
If you read the now-long list of things you can operate WITHOUT the RR-
class Restricted license, most boaters who don't go overseas or have HF
aboard don't need them.  If they operate HF RADIOTELEPHONES, or go
offshore, of course, they do.

Find ANY reference to operating DSC, whatsoever, under this license.  
There is none because this is a RADIOTELEPHONE license....VOICE and
plug-n-play radars that have no tuning ONLY.....No AIS, No GMDSS, NO DSC
on any band either!

Pressing the DSC button when the boat is sinking, of course, in a
distress, is legal without any license at all....just a Boat/US MMSI and
a GPS input that works is fine.  CALLING "HER ORGASM" ON DSC WITHOUT A
PROPER GMDSS RESTRICTED OPERATOR LICENSE IS NOT!  That's what it
says....

Please ask the FCC guys for clarification on this matter.  Part 80
doesn't even discuss this, it's still written for 1969 boats with
Raytheon tube radios on them.....or RCA CW transmitters using 813s.

Signature

-----
Larry

If a man goes way out into the woods all alone and says something,
is it still wrong, even though no woman hears him?

Steve Lusardi - 06 Jul 2009 18:00 GMT
Thanks Larry, good research, but this now opens another pandora's box. If
you have a Ships Station license and your equipment is all IMO approved
equipment, even though your vessel size does not require IMO/SOLAS
compliance, will I now be subject to the periodic inspection and
recertification rules these compliances demand? My gut feeling is yes.
Steve

>> Followup.... well the guy called "Me" back, Twice now, but I was out
>> of the cabin both times, so we are exchanging Phone Messages.... I did
[quoted text clipped - 109 lines]
> doesn't even discuss this, it's still written for 1969 boats with
> Raytheon tube radios on them.....or RCA CW transmitters using 813s.
Bruce in alaska - 07 Jul 2009 20:15 GMT
> Thanks Larry, good research, but this now opens another pandora's box. If
> you have a Ships Station license and your equipment is all IMO approved
> equipment, even though your vessel size does not require IMO/SOLAS
> compliance, will I now be subject to the periodic inspection and
> recertification rules these compliances demand? My gut feeling is yes.
> Steve

Ok, Here is the "Straight from the HORSE's Mouth, No sh.t, Poop" on
licensing AIS in the USA. I talked to the Wireless Rules Guy, himself...
AND.... Wait for it..... to be very frank, the term "Dufus" comes to
mind.

Larry is certainly CORRECT... someone back in FCC DC HQ is thinking like
a Bureaucrat, and not an Engineer, or Regulator....

1. AIS "IS" Covered by the Blanket US Waters Only VHF Marine License....
so it MAY be fitted to any US Vessel, with or WITHOUT a Ship Station
License.
   a. MMSI would be issued by Boats USA or one of the civilian MMSI
Registrars.

   b. Callsign can be either, some Old Callsign that the vessel had
previously, OR, something you MAKE UP, yourself.... No sh.t... that is
what Mr. FCC said....

2. As a Transponder, it requires NO Operators License, the same as a
Marine SART. for Radar.

3. This is for ALL AIS Transponders, of Either Class, fitted aboard a US
Flagged, Documented, non-Documented, or State Registered or unregistered
Vessel.

I really can't believe, that this, is how it it is, BUT THAT IS, "WHAT
the Guy SAID".....

SO, untill things change, That is the State of AIS, in the USofA....

Signature

Bruce in alaska
add <path> after <fast> to reply

Larry - 07 Jul 2009 21:31 GMT
>> Thanks Larry, good research, but this now opens another pandora's
>> box. If you have a Ships Station license and your equipment is all
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> SO, untill things change, That is the State of AIS, in the USofA....

Good grief.  Things at FCC have rotted much further away than I thought.

Ok, I'll just stand back and let them all have at it.  Has this guy got
a name and number we can reference when the NALs are delivered to the PO
Boxes?  "Yes, but Mr Rogers said.............and that's what we've been
operating under, his official statements, seeing as how the rules and
websites are so screwed up and unreadable."  That might be helpful to
someone who's staring that NAL in the face requiring a reply "or else".

Signature

-----
Larry

Noone will be safe until the last lawyer has been strangled by the
entrails of the last cleric.

Bruce Gordon - 09 Jul 2009 01:00 GMT
> >> Thanks Larry, good research, but this now opens another pandora's
> >> box. If you have a Ships Station license and your equipment is all
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> websites are so screwed up and unreadable."  That might be helpful to
> someone who's staring that NAL in the face requiring a reply "or else".

Well, it seems like there is a "SMALL" change in the FCC's Statement
about the Current Regulations for AIS fitted aboard "a US Flagged,
Documented, non-Documented, State Registered or unregistered Vessel"....

Mr FCC called "ME" back this morning, and on reflection, and
consultation, with others at HQ, his position "Now" is.....

1.  b. Callsigns FOR non-Licensed Voluntary Equipped US Flagged Vessels.
The Callsign programed into the AIS, should be the Vessels NAME, the
same name that is in the NAME Frame on the AIS. MMSI would be issued to
that Vessel Name, by one of the civilian Registrars, and logged into
that Database.

So, at least they got that "Small" Ident Problem solved.... BUT the rest
is still....  well what it is.....

Bruce in alaska

Signature

 Bruce (semiretired powderman & exFCC Field Inspector for Southeastern Alaska)

 Bruce Gordon * Debora Gordon R.N.          Bruce's Trading Post
       P.O. Box EXI                         Excursion Inlet South
    Juneau, Alaska 99850                Excursion Inlet, Alaska 99850
   AL7AQ * KL7WJ                     www.btpost.net    www.99850.net

Larry - 09 Jul 2009 03:16 GMT
Bruce Gordon <bgordon@99850.net> wrote in news:bgordon-
51CBC9.16004608072009@unknown.usenetserver.com:

> So, at least they got that "Small" Ident Problem solved.... BUT the rest
> is still....  well what it is.....
>
> Bruce in alaska

well, what it is....

Thanks for the information.  I'm sure someone will go back to rule making
and enforcement, someday....

Signature

-----
Larry

Noone will be safe until the last lawyer has been strangled by the entrails
of the last cleric.

Bruce in alaska - 09 Jul 2009 21:39 GMT
> Bruce Gordon <bgordon@99850.net> wrote in news:bgordon-
> 51CBC9.16004608072009@unknown.usenetserver.com:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Thanks for the information.  I'm sure someone will go back to rule making
> and enforcement, someday....

I am not expecting it in "My Lifetime".......

Signature

Bruce in alaska
add <path> after <fast> to reply

Larry - 07 Jul 2009 21:34 GMT
Bruce in alaska <fast@btpost.net> wrote in news:fast-125934.11171307072009
@unknown.usenetserver.com:

> SO, untill things change, That is the State of AIS, in the USofA....

Keep an eye out!  I might put AIS on my diesel stepvan!  Evidently FCC
doesn't care.....(c;]

Wonder if I can use W4CSC as the call.  I didn't make it up.  I paid for
it...

Won't be long you won't need a ham license, either....just money fed to the
ULS machine will do, the only thing FCC lawyers are interested in.

Signature

-----
Larry

Noone will be safe until the last lawyer has been strangled by the entrails
of the last cleric.

Larry - 07 Jul 2009 21:27 GMT
> Thanks Larry, good research, but this now opens another pandora's box.
> If you have a Ships Station license and your equipment is all IMO
> approved equipment, even though your vessel size does not require
> IMO/SOLAS compliance, will I now be subject to the periodic inspection
> and recertification rules these compliances demand? My gut feeling is
> yes. Steve

Don't think they'll have anything to do with pleasure craft inspection,
as a practical matter, not by law.  Anything that requires WORK they'll
shy away from.  My concern was only because boaters take way too casual
a view about radio LICENSING than is healthy, especially in this
paranoia over "homeland security".  They think that just because they
don't have to have a license to operate a VHF FM or an automated radar,
that allows them to operate anything else the radio sales dream teams
have to offer, and that's simply not true.

The FCC regs seem quite clear on GMDSS/DSC operation.  They have special
licenses AND TRAINING to use them that's required for their proper
operation, not just plug n play on S/V "Her Orgasm" at the whim of
Captain Clegg.  I merely wanted to know from someone with FCC
connections what was proper to keep people from getting FCC and CG
nastygrams, which can be very unsettling, even for the rich, when they
start talking about $10,000/DAY!

Noone wants to inspect.  But they DO want pleasure boats off these
commercial-in-mind systems.  Everyone, of course, except the equipment
manufacturers, who would install one in every Volkswagen if they thought
they could sell it.

Signature

-----
Larry

Noone will be safe until the last lawyer has been strangled by the
entrails of the last cleric.

John Navas - 06 Jul 2009 18:34 GMT
>> Followup.... well the guy called "Me" back, Twice now, but I was out
>> of the cabin both times, so we are exchanging Phone Messages.... I did
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>voyage.  That would, I'm guessing, require a GMDSS Operator's License to
>program, which is about half the AIS message format.

Not required for AIS Class B.

>Well, we DID answer the pressing question that NO, casual sailboaters
>will NOT just plug in an AIS to their GPS and antenna and go blindly
>around transmitting on AIS to anyone who listens with no license or
>training like they do VHF FM voice.  It's not a plug n play device.

AIS Class B is essentially play and play.

Definitive AIS information:
<http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/enav/ais/>

Signature

Best regards,
John Navas, publisher of Navas' Sailing & Racing in
the San Francisco Bay Area  <http://sail.navas.us/>

Steve Lusardi - 06 Jul 2009 18:57 GMT
That's a big leap John. You will need a Ship Station license if you sail
internationally period and AIS has nothing to do with it. Your statement is
correct only if you sail within US waters. If you have to have a Ships
Station license, what difference does it make with either class A or B?
Steve

>>> Followup.... well the guy called "Me" back, Twice now, but I was out
>>> of the cabin both times, so we are exchanging Phone Messages.... I did
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Definitive AIS information:
> <http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/enav/ais/>
John Navas - 06 Jul 2009 19:30 GMT
>That's a big leap John. You will need a Ship Station license if you sail
>internationally period and AIS has nothing to do with it. Your statement is
>correct only if you sail within US waters. If you have to have a Ships
>Station license, what difference does it make with either class A or B?

Ship Station License is no big deal.
<http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/othrcoms/fcc.htm>

There is considerable difference in operating Class A or Class B.
<http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/enav/ais/types_of_AIS.htm>

   * Has a reporting rate less than a Class A (e.g. every 30 sec.
     when under 14 knots, as opposed to every 10 sec. for Class A)
   * Does not transmit the vessel’s IMO number
   * Does not transmit ETA or destination
   * Does not transmit navigational status
   * Is only required to receive, not transmit, text safety messages
   * Is only required to receive, not transmit, application identifiers
     (binary messages)
   * Does not transmit rate of turn information
   * Does not transmit maximum present static draught

Signature

Best regards,
John Navas, publisher of Navas' Sailing & Racing in
the San Francisco Bay Area  <http://sail.navas.us/>

Larry - 02 Jul 2009 04:09 GMT
> Don't know about the licensing, but it's
> just another VHF radio.

DSC on GMDSS is "just another VHF radio", too.  But, according to the
rules not hearsay on the docks, the licensed ship must have TWO trained,
LICENSED GMDSS operators, one of which must not be encumbered to another
job in an emergency, to operate it.  I suspect AIS to come under the
same sort of digital rules, once they get it sorted out.  Your license-
free radio is only for use on certain channels and ONLY for voice
transmissions, not GMDSS/DSC and I suspect especially Class "A" AIS
which is a radio aid to navigation.

I still don't understand how an unlicensed pleasure boat with no GMDSS
operator or skill is allowed to use DSC, except in an emergency
situation, to call his buddies over DSC.  DSC is part of GMDSS.  And the
rules say:

http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=operations_2
&id=ship_stations

"What are the requirements regarding communications personnel aboard
GMDSS ships?
The FCC requires two licensed radio operators to be aboard all GMDSS
certified ships, one of whom must be available to act as a dedicated
radio operator during a distress situation. The radio operators must be
holders of a GMDSS Radio Operator's License. The GMDSS radio operator is
an individual licensed to handle radio communications aboard ships in
compliance with the GMDSS regulations, including basic equipment and
antenna adjustments. The GMDSS radio operator need not be a radio
officer.
Another IMO Convention requires all masters and mates to hold the GMDSS
Radio Operator's License and attend a two week training course and
demonstrate competency with operation of the GMDSS equipment. These
requirements would also carry to any person employed specifically to act
as a dedicated radio operator if the ship elected to carry such a
position. "

Of course, true to form, it has to be a hodge podge of nonsense only an
advanced law firm specializing in FCC law can understand:

"Where are the GMDSS regulations contained?
The GMDSS regulations are contained in 47 C.F.R. Part 80. Most of the
GMDSS regulations are in Subpart W of Part 80, but Subpart W also cross-
references certain other FCC rules, as follows (the cross-referencing
Subpart W is listed parenthetically after the cross-referenced rule):
13.2 (80.1073(a)), 13.21 (80.1073(a)), 80.334 (80.1114), 80.335
(80.1114), 80.836 (80.1065(b)(5)(iii)), 80.933 (80.1065(b)(5)(iii))."

But, for those of you with licenses that go offshore, notice it's a SHIP
LICENSE, not a pleasure boat radio license, and the rules of part 80 are
for SHIP LICENSEES to follow.  I agree it's crazy
47CFR part 80.1065(b)(5)(iii)))))))))))))) not withstanding.  
Who the hell writes this sh.t?

Signature

-----
Larry

If a man goes way out into the woods all alone and says something,
is it still wrong, even though no woman hears him?

Larry - 02 Jul 2009 04:11 GMT
Larry <noone@home.com> wrote in news:Xns9C3BEB86FCCBDnoonehomecom@
74.209.131.13:

> But, for those of you with licenses that go offshore, notice it's a SHIP
> LICENSE, not a pleasure boat radio license, and the rules of part 80 are
> for SHIP LICENSEES to follow.  I agree it's crazy
> 47CFR part 80.1065(b)(5)(iii)))))))))))))) not withstanding.  
> Who the hell writes this sh.t?

http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_08/47cfr80_08.html

It's all here in your Bible....and equally difficult to read as the
Christian one, also written by a bunch of idiot bureaucrats.

Signature

-----
Larry

If a man goes way out into the woods all alone and says something,
is it still wrong, even though no woman hears him?

Larry - 28 Jun 2009 03:09 GMT
>> Geof,
>> I bought a 1 year old Class A Simrad unit used as a demo unit for
>> marine shows on eBay for $1300. Please note, there are substantial
>> differences between Class A and Class B. One of which is the Class A
>> has its own internal GPS among many others.
>> Steve

Steve in Deutchland!  There are DIFFERENT AIS units allowed to be used in
DIFFERENT countries.  I finally found the list of approved units in the USA
on:
http://cgmix.uscg.mil/Equipment/EquipmentSearch.aspx

There are only 22 units Class A approved to date.

I'm sure Germany has a different, but similar list for German ship stations
to use.  AIS is a real mess.....a bureaucratic nightmare.

Signature

-----
Larry

If a man goes way out into the woods all alone and says something,
is it still wrong, even though no woman hears him?

Michael Porter - 27 Jun 2009 22:12 GMT
>Geof,
>I bought a 1 year old Class A Simrad unit used as a demo unit for marine
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> -- Geoff
>> www.GeoffSchultz.org 

I have found that my class B (ACR) works fine offshore.  The big guys
see me and I see them.

Class B transponders also have GPS built in.

Michael Porter

Michael Porter Marine Design
mporter at mp-marine dot com
www.mp-marine.com
Larry - 28 Jun 2009 03:24 GMT
>>Geof,
>>I bought a 1 year old Class A Simrad unit used as a demo unit for
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> mporter at mp-marine dot com
> www.mp-marine.com 

You guys might want to read Panbo's information on AIS operation....

http://www.panbo.com/admin/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=ais

Signature

-----
Larry

If a man goes way out into the woods all alone and says something,
is it still wrong, even though no woman hears him?

Larry - 28 Jun 2009 03:30 GMT
> Class B transponders also have GPS built in.

http://www.panbo.com/archives/2009/05/class_b_rollout_looking_better_but_my
sterious.html

Signature

-----
Larry

If a man goes way out into the woods all alone and says something,
is it still wrong, even though no woman hears him?

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.